Article: 50945 of rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
From: Dr. Anton T. Squeegee <SpammersAreVermin@dev.null>
Subject: Re: Here is the smoking gun
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:11:52 -0700
Message-ID: <MPG.1d0ecc77bff796a6989755@localhost>
References: <72f0fa95.fda2609b@mail.gregpalast.com> <1118033844.330205.133510@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

In article <1118033844.330205.133510@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, 
utility_infielder@earthlink.net says...

>  "But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."
> 
> At the Council of Foreign Relations meeting in San Francisco this week,
> as presented on CSPAN today, June 5 2005, the head Iraq sanctions

	<snip off-topic garbage>

	And this is related to digital modes of amateur radio operations, 
how? Exactly?

	*PLONK!*


-- 
Dr. Anton T. Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute.
(Known to some as Bruce Lane, ARS KC7GR, 
kyrrin (a/t) bluefeathertech[d=o=t]calm -- www.bluefeathertech.com
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped
with surreal ports?"


Article: 50947 of rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
From: "helmsman@mindspring.com" <helmsman@mindspring.com>
Subject: PH1PH - SK
Message-ID: <scija1p0vl5b0ogbrltf8qa9lrvrrp4huv@4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:11:52 GMT

PH1PH - SK
6-08-05


Article: 50948 of rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
From: Joseph Fenn <jfenn@lava.net>
Subject: winlink2.9 access via Digiptr?
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:14:16 -1000
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.61.0506121211300.24926@malasada.lava.net>

Does anyone know why we cant access our ctrl station ab6usa via
our "MARS" digipeater??   Someone says there is no way to setup
winlink so it will accept connections thru a digipeater.   So
far we have'nt found out why.
                     Joe/ABM6JF


**********************************************************
* Ham KH6JF AARS/MARS ABM6JF QCWA WW2 VET WD RADIO SYSTEM*
* Army MARS PRECEDED by AARS (Army Amateur Radio System) * 
**********************************************************



Article: 50949 of rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
From: "xpyttl" <xpyttl_NOSPAM@earthling.net>
References: <9I2dnWgf4MsIzDHfRVn-pw@rogers.com>
Subject: Re: looking for frequency synthesizer chip
Message-ID: <lB6re.5669$Ub4.2494@fe06.lga>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:56:12 -0400

Because of the availability of examples, the AD9850 is probably the simplest
to use.  But some of the newer AD chips will give you cleaner output.  They
get there with higher frequency oscillators, though, which translates into
more power.  Most folks clock the 9850 at 100 or 120 MHz.  Canned 100 MHz
oscillators tend to be pretty power hungry.  The 9850 also gets hungry as
the clock goes up.  At least some of the newer synth chips use less power,
but I don't know what you can do about 400 MHz clocks.

TI has some VHF/UHF chips that I know some folks have run as low as 50 MHz.
These use a crystal in the 20 MHz range instead of an external clock and are
pretty reasonably priced.  If your objective is to go into a mixer, then you
could divide down a UHF synth to get to your 5-15 neighborhood.

..

"larry" <larya@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:9I2dnWgf4MsIzDHfRVn-pw@rogers.com...
> Greetings..
>
> I am looking for a frequency synthesizer chip that will have an output
> anywhere from 5 mhz to 15 mhz.. or wider..
>
> channel spacing of 1 hz...
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Larry ve3fxq
>
>