Re: **skivvies**

From: Jim Beale (beale@uconect.net)
Date: Fri Apr 03 1998 - 00:54:10 EST

• Next message: Paul S. Dixon: "Re: **skivvies**"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: **skivvies**"
• In reply to: Paul S. Dixon: "Re: **skivvies**"
• Next in thread: Paul S. Dixon: "Re: **skivvies**"
• Reply: Paul S. Dixon: "Re: **skivvies**"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 11:14 AM -0500 4/1/98, Paul S. Dixon wrote:

>>Why can't the nominatives "DEXIOTHS KAI NOOS" be the subject?
>
>NOOS is the genitive of NOUS. BAG has: NOUS, NOOS, NOI, NOUN.
>Consistent use in the NT bears this out.
>
>Taking NOUS as the genitive, I pretty much assumed DEXIOTHS was a
>genitive in parallel and with the -HS ending.

Ack, you're absolutely right. I thought NOOS was nominative.
I didn't even bother to check it. Shame, shame... :-(

Thanks!

In Christ,
Jim

   The good man does not grieve that other people
   do not recognize his merits. His only anxiety
   is lest he should fail to recognize theirs.
   -- Confucius

• Next message: Paul S. Dixon: "Re: **skivvies**"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: **skivvies**"
• In reply to: Paul S. Dixon: "Re: **skivvies**"
• Next in thread: Paul S. Dixon: "Re: **skivvies**"
• Reply: Paul S. Dixon: "Re: **skivvies**"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:20 EDT