Re: Relationship of grammar to exegesis

From: Will Wagers (hyle@gte.net)
Date: Fri Jul 24 1998 - 09:00:09 EDT


Carl writes:

>To me this is self-evident. Would anyone disagree with the following
>statement?
>
>"Few, if any, B-Greekers make the simplistic assumption that determining
>the precise meanings of words in context, parsing the verbs, nouns, and
>adjectives and construing the syntax of a Biblical Greek verse, is
>sufficient to unlock all the meaning in that verse. But most, if not all
>B-Greekers, do assume, I think, that one must do this spade-work with a
>text before serious exploration of the broad range of questions involved in
>exegesis of the text in question. What we postulate is not that exegesis is
>nothing but grammar, but that grammatical analysis is a SINE QUA NON in the
>exegetical process."

I would go further, believing that grammar, etymology, plus other sources
and sympathetic study is insufficient to unlock the meaning in many cases.

Will Wagers hyle@gte.net "Reality is the best metaphor."

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:54 EDT