From: clayton stirling bartholomew (c.s.bartholomew@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Mon Jun 07 1999 - 13:04:17 EDT
Is SULLAMBANW active (not middle) ever found with a substantive in the
dative case where it means seize or arrest?
I am trying to make sense out of one of the "obvious errors" in Codex
Bezae, Acts 17:18 which replaces SUNEBALLON with SUNELABON. I know that
making sense out of "obvious errors" is a dubious exercise but then
reading Codex Bezae is a dubious exercise as well.
There is another "obvious error" which is hard to read in this verse,
the replacement of hOI DE with OIDEN. I didn't find anyway to make sense
out of that one, but the SUNELABON reading seemed to hover on the
boundary of intelligibility with the exception of the dative pronoun
AUTWi.
-- Clayton Stirling Bartholomew Three Tree Point P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:29 EDT