RE: gennawing males

From: James Ernest (jernest@hendrickson.com)
Date: Wed Dec 01 1999 - 14:42:10 EST

Next message: Bart Ehrman: "Re: gennawing males"
Previous message: James Ernest: "RE: gennawing males"
Maybe in reply to: Bart Ehrman: "gennawing males"
Next in thread: Bart Ehrman: "Re: gennawing males"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Right, "begat" is currently unusable; but I don't think
the same applies to "have begotten".

James

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim West [mailto:jwest@highland.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 2:09 PM
To: Biblical Greek
Cc: b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
Subject: Re: gennawing males

<snip>
Begat is old and senseless for most.
<snip>

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu

Next message: Bart Ehrman: "Re: gennawing males"
Previous message: James Ernest: "RE: gennawing males"
Maybe in reply to: Bart Ehrman: "gennawing males"
Next in thread: Bart Ehrman: "Re: gennawing males"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:47 EDT