From: Chris Core (jesuslover@neteze.com)
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 17:16:05 EDT
Is there any reason to think that because UMA is second person, that
TINAS must be of the
same audience. As I see it the TINAS and PANTAS are of the same audience
and separate from
UMA, is there a rule for me to follow with this or must I rely solely on
the context? Could
someone shed some light on this for me.
in Christ -chris core
2 Peter 3:9 is as follows:
9 OUBRADUNEI KURIOS THS EPAGGELIAS WS TINES BRADUTHTA HGOUNTAI ALLA
MAKROQUMEI
EIS UMA MH BOULOMENOS TINAS APOLESQAI ALLA PANTAS EIS METANOIAN XWRHSAI
The parsings I have are as follows:
UMA
Noun
Pronoun
Accusaative
Second
Plural
TINAS
Adjective
Pronominal
Indefinite
Accusative
Masculine
Plural
PANTAS
Adjective
Pronominal
Accusative
Masculine
Plural
---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:26 EDT