From: Mark Wilson (emory2oo2@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 25 2002 - 00:40:36 EST
<x-flowed>
2:2
EIS TO MH TACEWS SALEUQHNAI hUMAS APO TOU NOOS,
MHTE QROEISQAI MHTE DIA PNEUMATOS
MHTE DIA LOGOU MHTE DI' EPISTOLHS hWS DI' hHMWN
hWS hOTI ENESTHKEN hH hHMERA TOU CRISTOU
2:3
MH TIS hUMAS EXAPATHSHi KATA MHDENA TROPON
hOTI EAN MH ELQHi Hh APOSTASIA PRWTON
KAI APOKALUFQHi hO ANQRWPOS TAS hAMARTIAS
hO hUIOS THS APWLEIAS
According to an article I read this weekend,
the apodosis that needs to be supplied from
verse 2 for verse 3 should be:
"the Day of the Lord is not present"
(rather than, "that day shall not come")
Since the supplied apodosis is not stated as
such in verse 2, I am wondering how such an
argument could be made?
If this supplied apodosis is a possibility, then I have
a follow up question. But I will hold that for now.
Thanks,
Mark Wilson
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
</x-flowed>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:22 EDT