The Pacers find themselves in the unusual position of playing basketball
in May.  The have the 15th pick and are represented by:

  Richard "I don't know Martha" Burton

He selects: Charlie Ward, PG, 6-0. FSU. ===================================================================== Like any good GM, I take full responsibilty for my picks and actions but I also listen to those "in the organization"; as a result, I consulted my fellow Pacer fans on the Pacer e-mail group; it didn't really change whom I considered and picked all that much, but several people looked at things from a different perspective and gave more good reasons behind the logic below. Thanks go out to Mike Von Foerster, the finn, Paul Connolly, Eugene Wallingford, Stephen Wilson, Thomas Triske, and especially Robert Orr. I. Team Needs/History The Indiana Pacers are coming off their best year in NBA history in spite of missing a team NBA record of 208 man-games due to injury in the regular season. Starting 1-6 and 16-23, the Pacers finished the season as the second-hottest team behind the Sonics and proceeded to sweep the Magic in the first round to enter the second round of the playoffs for the first time in the franchise's NBA history; beat the top-seeded Hawks in six; and advanced to the Eastern Conference Finals against the Knicks. The only real star is Reggie Miller; the team truly is playing defense and team ball for the first time since the ABA days. Robert Orr of the Pacers e-mail group put the strategy best: the secret for a mid- to top-level team to get better through the draft is to draft what you will need the most in a year or two, not now. With that in mind, ... A. CENTER Finally, after all these years, Rik Smits has shown up and been the kind of center that GM Donny Walsh (and few others) envisioned. Smits dropped about 30 pounds before the season, allowing him to be more mobile and reducing his knee problems. He is an effective, if not awe-inspiring center. He uses his 7'4" frame and good shooting touch to draw out opposing centers and open the lane for others. Smits also is a good passer; he will often draw double teams outside of the lane then dish off to a cutting teammate for a quick two points and maybe a foul. Smits is also rebounding and defending better than he ever has. At backup this past year was LaSalle Thompson; he will be 34 at the start of next season. With his injuries and large contract, Tank probably won't be around for the Pacers. Scott Haskin, the '93 first round pick, is a 6'11" banger who was drafted with the idea of his backing up Smits; injuries and the unexpected play of Antonio Davis have impeded his progress. Haskin is Larry Brown's man, however, and there is every reason to think that Brown was behind the drafting of Haskin after the deal for Greg Graham fell through. Haskin has some decent offensive moves, plays fearlessly, can block shots, has good strength, and, most importantly, has the work ethic to play for Larry Brown. Though a project like most big men, Haskin does not look to be the next Scott Hastings or Greg Dreiling. The ability of Antonio Davis to back up Smits will allow Haskin to learn/ease his way into this role. B. POWER FORWARD The Indiana Pacers are blessed with what may be the best power forward duo in the NBA. In more than name, both Dale and Antonio Davis are quite similar. Both are 6'11" power forwards who can rebound, block shots, play tight defense, run the floor, and provide scoring when the Smits and Miller draw extra defensive attention. They both are intelligent players, rarely making dumb mistakes. (They also share a rather skewed sense of humor; for one Pacer game, they agreed to buy a free ticket for anyone who could prove his/her last name was "Davis"; 1975 showed up. Dale's response? "I guess it would have been better if our last name was Krystowiak.") They feed off one another, each pushing the other in practice and in games, but the rivalry is friendly one. The Pacers are as solid at this position as any team in the league. Trading either would be a major mistake unless the next Mel Daniels comes to the Pacers in the deal. C. SMALL FORWARD Derrick McKey is a true rarity among today's athletes: his game suffers because he is not selfish enough. Coach Brown and Derrick's teammates want to see him shoot and drive more. McKey's play, however, is not about stats; he is the defensive stopper, he rebounds, chases loose balls, keeps rebounds alive for his teammates, cuts off passing lanes, blocks out, leads the break, etc etc. In other words, he's the guy everyone wants on his team and wants to see succeed. In my mind, the Pacers got the best in trading McKey for Schrempf. The team now has a defensive presence, a mental toughness, and a scrappiness it sorely lacked before, due as much to McKey as Larry Brown. He may never make the All-Star team, but McKey may be the most important player on the Pacers. It would be nice to see him shoot (and score) more, but you can't have everything. Sam Mitchell is a 6'7" swing forward who was a throw-in player on the Person-Richardson trade, and as of now is more important to the Pacers than Pooh. Mitchell backs up McKey and plays power forward when the Pacers go to a small lineup. Mitchell is not a great player, but like McKey, he is the type of player everyone wants to play with. He rebounds, defends, and has a great work ethic. McKey's other backup is Kenny Williams, a former second round pick. Williams is a high-flying athlete who can come off the bench for instant scoring and rebounding; he is also hungry to prove that he belongs in the NBA. His lack of defense hurts his playing time, but that will likely improve with another year under Larry Brown; Williams has never been well-coached, and benefits greatly from Larry Brown's teaching. The problems with Williams are >from the neck up, but many of those seem to be resolved. D. SHOOTING GUARD Reggie Miller is cocky. He loves road games when the crowds get on him. He thinks he's the best shooting guard in the NBA. He's right. Miller can knock out the lights and is one of the two best scorers in Pacers' history. Like many great shooters, though, Miller is not a great defender. At 6-7 and 185 pounds, he can't knock people around, and his lateral quickness leaves a bit to be desired. However, he makes up for this with intelligence, intensity, anticipation, work ethic, and desire. This comes out in close games, when he demands the ball. That he is just as likely to drive and pass to an open teammate as do it all himself is evidence of his maturity and team play. Miller is surprisingly durable. His skinny frame takes a pounding every game >from all the picks and the constant motion without the ball. But he plays every game hard, and has missed only a few games in the last five years, due to a dinged knee. Reggie is the franchise player and leader; he knows it and the other players know it. Backing up Miller is veteran Byron Scott. Though no spring chicken, Scott is still in great shape and his skills are showing no signs of eroding. He has brought maturity, experience, and focus to the Pacers, the best money the team has spent in the last 20 years. Scott, however, may only be around for another year or two, then moved to an assistant position. (Some on the Pacer list believe that Byron would eventually make a very good coach, and I agree.) Behind Scott is swingman Malik Sealy. Sealy is a sleek, smooth scorer who is losing out in a numbers game. The backlog of players at shooting guard and small forward make Malik trade bait. E. POINT GUARD This position is very interesting. Consummate journeyman Heywood Workman was brought on to back up Vern Fleming, who was the backup to Pooh Richardson. When Richardson went down with an injury, Workman got playing time and turned out to be better than Fleming. Workman is a living ABC Movie of the Week. He was cut by two different teams, spent time in Europe, barely made the Pacers' roster this season, then led the team deep into the playoffs once he got his chance. To further the cliche', he does this because he makes the others on the court better. Larry Brown wanted a point guard who thinks "pass" before "shoot", and he found him in Workman. Though his shooting leaves a lot to be desired, it did improve (especially in the playoffs against Orlando and Atlanta). He is also the best defensive point guard of Indiana's trio. There are a lot of things that Workman does not do well. Losing is one of them. Unlike past starting point guards, Workman has the respect of his coach and teammates; the starting job is his to lose. Behind Workman is Vern Fleming, a 10 year pro out of Georgia. Pacer broadcaster and former coach Slick Leonard probably described Vern best when he said, "Vern isn't that great an athlete, but he does one thing very well. He wins." Fleming is a great backup at the point, able to dish, play decent defense, and drives the lane with abandon. He has lost his starting job to Michael Williams, Richardson, and Workman, never once complaining. He is a calming influence on the team, having never drawn a technical foul in almost 800 games, and provides veteran leadership. He is also nearing his final days, and will probably be gone, one way or another, after another two years. One way or another, Pooh Richardson is going to be a key to future success of the franchise. Though generally considered a disappointment, much of his first two years with the Pacers was spent on the injured list. This, plus the coaching change, has denied Pooh the chance to truly shine with the Pacers. His talent is undeniable, but his drive and determination are questionable. As the GM, I would bring Richardson in after the playoffs, and explain the situation to him: The starting job is Workman's, Heywood earned it; nobody can deny that. However, the job is there for Pooh, IF he works hard, listens to his coach and teammates, and does what he needs to to improve. (This is mainly defense and outside shooting.) If Richardson doesn't like it, trade him. Plenty of teams are looking for skilled point guards, and a trade involving Pooh and Malik can give a team an instant backcourt. I'd expect Pooh to be a problem if the starting job is Workman's, but maybe he's learned something watching the playoffs in street clothes. ************************ In short, the Pacers are at the very least solid at every position, and have every reason to move Sealy and Richardson. Another backup to Smits would be nice, but this draft isn't all that deep at center. A high-scoring small forward to backup/compliment McKey would be nice, but they Pacers may have that player in Kenny Williams, so this is not a top priority. The reserve guards are aging, so drafting a backup guard who 1) can and will accept being this role, and 2) is willing to spend a year or two learning the ropes of the NBA, and 3) can play defense or is likely to learn is probably the best selection. II. Your Selection (and explanation) Damo... (Put that gun down, Craig) Charlie Ward, Florida State. Right now, there are better guards left in the draft. However, the Pacers don't need help now; they will need it in a year or two. Granted, Ward has not played a full college season in three years; however, he has all the tools to be a good point guard that will fit in with the team: he's quick, athletic, intelligent, a potentially tenacious defender, a good ballhandler, and a winner. His shooting could stand some work, but he'll have time to work on it. Ward has been impressive in his improvement in the USBL, and should be a VERY good point guard by that time. This does seem like a high place to pick Ward; he needs time, experience, teaching from veterans and a good coach to achieve his great potential. He would recieve all that with the Pacers; it is the perfect situation for Ward and the franchise. Though he might play football, he has said that he prefers basketball. The possibility of him signing with the NFL or CFL exists, but it is rather small, especially after Ward went undrafted by the NFL. III. Others considered (and why considered) Jervaughn Scales, Southern. A little-known player from the SWAC, Scales is a 6-7 small forward who is a strong rebounder, though his stats undoubtedly were helped by playing in a small conference. He is aggressive, plays solid D, and has really impressed a lot of NBA scouts. His free throw shooting and ballhandling need work, but he could provide the scoring punch from the SF spot the Pacers need. In truth, he will probably be gone by this time in the real draft. Askia Jones, Kansas State. Jones is a good shooter, albeit a streaky one, who could be a decent backup in the right situation. My main knock against Ski is his ballhandling is not good enough to be a backup point guard; the Pacers will need someone who can fill in at the point in a year or two, and Jones, though a shooting guard, is closer to the small forward side of shooting guard than the point guard side. Still, he is a good shooter and was a decent defender in college. I think he'll become a solid if not fantastic pro if he gets a chance in the right situation, but something tell me this isn't that situation. (Mike Von Foerster likes him a lot, and if Jones exceeds my expectations, I will tip my hat to Mike.) Derrick Phelps, UNC. A good ballhandler with a solid background, Phelps is a good defender, which is what Brown loves. Though not flashy like Kidd, Phelps is the solid, dependable type of player that the Pacers will need in a year or two. His shooting needs a lot of work, though. Larry Brown and GM Donnie Walsh are UNC guys, so Phelps might be drafted. Bill McCaffery, Vanderbilt. McCaffery is not going to make an instant impact in the NBA, but that's fine. In two or three years, when the Pacers would need him, he should be ready. Granted, his strength is questionable, but he would be backing up Miller, who is not the strongest of players, so he might fit in as the backup. Damon Bailey, Indiana. Laugh away, folks, but Bailey would be a good fit for the Pacers. Damon is the next Billy Keller: tough, a good ballhandler and shooter, a decent defender, possessing solid fundamentals; a smart player who makes few mistakes and plays in the team concept. His first three years at Indiana he played with two of the top ten scorers in IU history, and in his senior year played through some painful injuries, as did several teammates. However, the Pacers have a couple second round picks, and Bailey might be there for the earlier one (from Philadelphia); (then again, he might not). Eric Montross, UNC. Though not a fluid athlete by any stretch of anybody's imagination, Eric Montross could be a decent backup center, a hometown kid without Jeff George's ego, and a known quantity. He doesn't have Dare's potential, but he's less likely to be a complete and total bust. Doremus Bennerman, Siena. A REAL stretch at this place in the draft, Bennerman could nonetheless become a great backup point guard. I was impressed by his performance in the NIT, and see him as a Mack Calvin kind of player, someone who gets in the game and creates havoc with his speed and tenacity. Bennerman would be a great second round pick for a team looking for a backup point guard. IV. Who the team will probably take Very tough to say. This pick will not likely improve the team immediately, so look for the Pacer management to try to move up by trading the pick + Sealy/ Richardson, deal Sealy and/or Richardson for a pick then using two picks to move up, or trading some combo of Richardson/Sealy/the draft pick for another player. GM Donnie Walsh has turned out to be one of the better GMs in the league. He is not afraid of trading; he got Detlef Schrempf for Herb Williamson, Richardson/Mitchell for Person/Michael Williams, McKey for Det. Walsh also has a knack for finding good players with later picks (Dale Davis was a steal; Antonio Davis, Kenny Williams, and Sean Green were all second round picks; Michael Williams and Heywood Workman were GREAT free agent finds. (Sealy would be a good player on a team without such a logjam at SF/SG.)) Look for the Pacers to make *at least* one deal and move up or down. V. Other moves that the team should make (In no particular order of importance) 1) Make sure Byron Scott has a contract with the team for next year. 2) Don't listen to ANY trade involving either Davis, except for ones ridiculously favoring the Pacers. 3) Make a decision on Pooh ASAP. 4) Talk to the Spurs and Sixers about having an instant backcourt of Richardson and Sealy. The MIGHTY NUGGETS might be interested in Pooh as well. 5) Give Antonio Davis and Heywood Workman raises. 6) Re-sign Dale Davis using LaSalle Thomson's money/slot. 7) Tell Chuck Person that you don't want him back in Indiana, even as a free agent. 8) Trade for a relatively high second-round pick, draft Bailey, and let him play in Europe for a year. ==================================================================== Draft Summary: 1. Milwaukee Bucks GM: Bobby Davis Pick: Glenn Robinson, PF, 6-8. Purdue University. 2. Dallas Mavericks GM: Theo Wendt Pick: Jason Kidd, PG, 6-4. Cal. 3. Detroit Pistons GM: Eric Iverson Pick: Grant Hill, SF, 6-8. Duke. 4. Minnesota Timberwolves GM's: Kevin Hansen Toni Morgan Pick: Donyell Marshall, SF, 6-9. Connecticut 5. Washington Bullets GM's: Jim Nagle The Crossjammer Pick: Juwan Howard, PF, 6-10. Michigan 6. Philadelphia 76ers GM's: Brent Halliburton Pick: Yinka Dare, C, 7-0. George Washington 7. Los Angeles Clippers GM: Paul Osmond Pick: Carlos Rogers, PF, 6-11. Tennessee State 8. Sacramento Kings GM's: Don Hearth Daniel W. Huang Pick: Clifford Rozier, PF, 6-9. Louisville 9. Boston Celtics GM: Ellie Cutler Pick: Lamond Murray, SF, 6-7. Cal 10. Los Angeles Lakers GM: Kosh Pick: Jalen Rose, SG, 6-8. Michigan 11. Seattle Sonics GM: Aaron Gill Pick: Wesley Person, SG, 6-6. Auburn 12. Miami Heat GM: Rob Clough Pick: Sharone Wright, C, 6-11. Clemson 13. Denver Nuggets GM's: Rick Grubin John Exby Pick: B.J. Tyler, PG, 6-1. Texas 14. New Jersey Nets GM: Matthew Mitchell Pick: Dontonio Wingfield, PF, 6-9. Cincinnati 15. Indiana Pacers GM: Richard Burton Pick: Charlie Ward, PG, 6-0. FSU Next up: 16. Golden State Warriors GM: Mike Moore


Craig Simpson - Usenet Draft Commissioner