In the grand tradition of Usenet drafts past, we have lost a GM.
Jason Drisko has taken a flyer on us and I have been forced to get a
backup.  Mike Northam

, who so ably served as the Blazers GM last year, was kind enough to take the time to GM again this year. Thanks Mike!! The Blazers, with the 17th pick, select: Jim McIlvane, C, 7-1. Marquette. ===================================================================== The Blazers GM, Jason Drisko, is apparently out of town and so, in a pinch, a few participants in the Blazer fan list have thrown together the following pick and analysis. My apologies to Jason if this isn't what he originally intended. I. Team Needs/History The Portland Trailblazers are a team on a downward slide from the lofty heights of the NBA finals only two years ago. The last two seasons have seen injuries and inconsistencies on the court, and an apparent front office political struggle off the court. They have been eliminated in the opening round of the playoffs two years in a row. The fans, who have no other major league team to distract them, are focused on the Blazers and they are up in arms. For the first time in history, boos have been heard in perpetually sold-out Memorial Coliseum. You can bet your house that there will be upcoming player trades. No one is safe from a possible trade, but most talk has focused on Terry Porter and Clyde Drexler (even with his balloon contract this coming year), and at least one of the forwards (Harvey Grant, Tracy Murray, Jerome Kersey). Recent changes have had the GM, Geoff Petrie ("Mr. Blazer") resigning unexpectedly, and coach Rick Adelman being fired, expectedly. Brad Greenberg, VP of Player Personnel, is currently in charge, but his main task is in finding a new coach. (Paul Allen, the billionaire owner of the team, is working on finding a new GM.) Thus this year's draft finds the team "in between", with many things unsettled. Who will be the new coach? What style of play will the team employ? What trades will be made? All of these are unknowns and make it difficult to choose in the draft. CENTER Chris Dudley has an opt-out clause in his contract. The Blazers went through fire and fury and court battles with David Stern to get his contract approved in the first place, so they most likely will attempt to resign Dudley, who played in only a few games this season due to an broken ankle. His playoff performance was impressive--he was the only Blazer who could control Olajuwon, and I think the Blazers should keep him. Even if he loses his starting job, he still can be effective as a stopper off the bench. The question is, how much to pay him? The NBA will be watching carefully, looking for evidence that the Blazers made a "secret deal" last summer, which would be QUITE illegal. He deserves more than $700k... I could see paying him in the $1.5-2 million range. The $3 million Jersey offered him last year is ridiculous. You pay a Danny Manning that kind of money. You DON'T pay a Chris Dudley that kind of money. Reggie Smith, a marginal player is the nominal backup center, but he has seen relatively little playing time in two seasons and was left off the playoff roster. Kevin Thompson lingered on the injured reserve list all year, with what must have been the world's worst case of tendinitis. :-) It's unlikely that he'll be contributing much more than that in the coming season. FORWARDS Buck Williams has been signed to a new contract and will remain the Blazers' starting power forward. Mark Bryant will fill-in as backup (and also do some center duty, though he is small for that position). Clifford (don't call me Cliff) Robinson is a legitimate all-star candidate and will remain the key figure for the Blazers' inside game. Harvey Grant, surprisingly ineffectual at small forward may well be traded, but if he remains with the team will be the initial starter. Jerome Kersey, plagued by aching knees, will provide energy off the bench, and Tracy Murray, the NBA's leading 3-point shooter during the regular season (who saw little playoff action, surprisingly) will also be available for duty. Since Cliffy will be likely returning to full-time duty at SF next season, ONE of these will have to go. Grant is a better defender and rebounder than Murray (in fact, his 'D' was a pleasant surprise, on the other hand his 'O' was a surprise of a different sort), but may be hard to deal because of his salary. (He may opt out, but if he's smart, he won't.) Murray, on the other hand, has the potential to be a devastating offensive weapon off the bench. However, he has to have plays run for him to be effective, as the league is well aware of his shooting prowess. He is making about $1 million, and might be easier to trade. Possible trades include Murray for Anthony Mason (an excellent rebounder/defender who is on Pat Riley's list, this trade is OK under the cap if the Blazers throw in a $150K stiff to match salaries), or Grant for Mason and Blackman (Blackman would give us a veteran swingman, particularly useful if Drexler goes; not sure if this deal will pass muster under the cap or not.) GUARDS The Blazers have always been strong at guard, though Clyde Drexler's level of performance has fallen off noticeably in recent years. Drexler, now that the season is over, will want to re-open negotiations over his contract. Now that he appears to be fully recovered from his knee, ankle, and hamstring injuries, he is the Clyde of old on offense. Unfortunately, he has lost a lot of lateral quickness, and now gets burned on defense with regularity. Last year, he was asking for a 1-year, $17 million extension. Is he worth it? If the Blazers can't reach a settlement soon (he should get SOMETHING, although $17M is ridiculous), he should be traded. Clyde should bear in mind, though, that if he IS traded, he loses the argument of "look what I've done in the past", which a large part of his demands are based on. His new team will say, "you haven't done us anything in the past." If Drexler is traded, the Blazers should get a good player out of it, or a good draft pick. Rod Strickland at the point was arguably the most effective point guard in the Western Conference (he outplayed John Stockton and Kevin Johnson in virtually all their head-to-head matchups). Backups Terry Porter and James "Hollywood" Robinson have been effective in relief, though Porter in particular seems unhappy with his reduced role on the team and is a most likely trade candidate. Jaren Jackson, a surprise addition to the playoff roster, will most likely be back in the CBA. The Blazers have the following needs (in order of importance): A center: We went 47-25 without one, but one would be handy. We don't necessarily need a starter, but we don't need another project sitting on the bench. I imagine Dudley will start, but the center we choose should be able to play extended minutes when Duds gets into foul trouble (and he will!), should be able to at LEAST play position D, and have a reliable post-up move. With the number 17 pick in the draft, and no salary slots available barring a trade (or Harvey deciding to opt out and head elsewhere), we won't be able to get someone with all of desirable traits. But decent D/rebounding ability, and a good post-up move, should be paramount. We should be willing to sacrifice shotblocking, great passing (although let's not get a black hole), and running the floor (if we want a quick fastbreak unit, move Cliffy to center.) An excellent defensive guard off the bench (either position): When your best defensive players at the guard spot are Jaren Jackson and James Robinson, you have a problem. Drexler's body won't allow him to play the great defense he used to, Porter gets burned by quick guards, and Rod has a tendency to forget about controlling his man on the defensive end. (When he sets his mind to it, Rod can be a good defender, but he doesn't always do so.) The Blazers need a good defender off the bench who can come in and shut opposing guards down (or at least slow the down). Craig Ehlo is available as a free agent, but he will likely stay in Atlanta. If the Blazers cannot get a good center, they should draft here. As Hollywood can play decent `D' on opposing points, a big swingman (2/3) would be ideal. Defense should be the important factor, although the player should have some offensive game (either a good outside shot, a good penetration move, or a good post-up game--preferably one of the first two), and rebounding and passing will of course help. A good, rebounding 3/4 man: This is another option to consider. There are a few of these available in the draft. Another thing to consider is that the Buck Williams might retire in a few years (or sooner), and the Blazers MIGHT look for an eventual replacement in the starting lineup. II. Your Selection (and explanation) Jim McIlvane, 7'1" center, Marquette. A shot-blocking defensive center (led Division I in shot blocks) who also has some good offensive post moves (though his range is limited). His passing ability will stand him in good stead with what may well be a motion-oriented Blazer offense next season. His rebounding is a good, but it needs work. He is thin, and sometimes has great difficulty in blocking out players who can quick their way around him. With a stength program perhaps he will become better at rebounding, but it is hard to tell at this stage what effect that will have. After all, at 7 foot he is going to get quite a few boards anyway. Scout: Paul Osmond III. Others considered (and why considered) Eric Mobley, Pittsburgh McIlvaine was generally considered to be the best center available at this draft position. Mobley definitely has an NBA-type body (a "Shaq" type as one person put it), but his limited range was against him. This was a close choice between the two however. Khalid Reeves, Arizona. Though a shooting guard at Arizona, he is considered a point guard prospect in the NBA. Anticipating that the Blazers will likely make a trade at guard, they may well be in need of a backup point guard. Still, Reeves' ball-handling skills are suspect and that is ultimately why I didn't choose him, as after the regular season success of the Seattle Supersonics last year, I'm anticipating that more teams will employ a pressing-type defense next year. Reeves would be nice, but the Blazers have such an abundance of backcourt options that we don't need to draft that position. And Reeves isn't such a talent as to warrant drafting out of our positional needs. Brian Grant, Xavier Although he has apparently shown well in the tryout camps, the Blazers' primary needs are not at forward. We might have taken a flyer at someone with star potential, such as Dontonio Wingfield, but he was not available. Eric Montross, UNC The leading center candidate after Yinka Dare was not available at #17. IV. Who the team will probably take I believe the Blazers' pick will actually be determined by their trade plans, and that is not possible to know at this time. However, given the team's current constitution, I believe they will go with the best center available, which could quite possibly be Eric Montross. One never gets a superstar at #17, but Montross looks to be at least a journeyman center, and could find a place on this team. V. Other moves that the team should make Bring in the moving vans! This team is likely to look a lot different next season. Paul Allen has the bucks and he is committed to building a winning team. He was noticeably upset with the team's inconsistent and at times indifferent attitude last season, and I think he's willing to trade anyone--even to the point of just making a change. After all, we've already seen the GM and coach leave, can at least a few players be far behind? Maybe even a blockbuster, multi-player kind of deal. It's not even inconceivable that they could trade up to get a lottery pick, though I personally feel this is less likely than other trades. The first order of business, though, is obviously finding a new coach and GM. Who these people turn out to be will go a long way toward determining the makeup of the rest of the team. Thanks to the following who contributed to this report: Jason Drisko drisko@ics.com Gene Rollins rollins+@cs.cmu.edu Brett Barksdale brett@oce.orst.edu Jennifer L. Brown jlbrown@mailbox.syr.edu Isaiah Watas Cox iwcox@phoenix.princeton.edu Michael A. Holtzclaw mholtzcl@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu Scott Johnson johnsos@aldur.ece.orst.edu Mike Northam mbn@teleport.com =============================================================== Draft Summary: 1. Milwaukee Bucks GM: Bobby Davis Pick: Glenn Robinson, PF, 6-8. Purdue University. 2. Dallas Mavericks GM: Theo Wendt Pick: Jason Kidd, PG, 6-4. Cal. 3. Detroit Pistons GM: Eric Iverson Pick: Grant Hill, SF, 6-8. Duke. 4. Minnesota Timberwolves GM's: Kevin Hansen Toni Morgan Pick: Donyell Marshall, SF, 6-9. Connecticut 5. Washington Bullets GM's: Jim Nagle The Crossjammer Pick: Juwan Howard, PF, 6-10. Michigan 6. Philadelphia 76ers GM's: Brent Halliburton Pick: Yinka Dare, C, 7-0. George Washington 7. Los Angeles Clippers GM: Paul Osmond Pick: Carlos Rogers, PF, 6-11. Tennessee State 8. Sacramento Kings GM's: Don Hearth Daniel W. Huang Pick: Clifford Rozier, PF, 6-9. Louisville 9. Boston Celtics GM: Ellie Cutler Pick: Lamond Murray, SF, 6-7. Cal 10. Los Angeles Lakers GM: Kosh Pick: Jalen Rose, SG, 6-8. Michigan 11. Seattle Sonics GM: Aaron Gill Pick: Wesley Person, SG, 6-6. Auburn 12. Miami Heat GM: Rob Clough Pick: Sharone Wright, C, 6-11. Clemson 13. Denver Nuggets GM's: Rick Grubin John Exby Pick: B.J. Tyler, PG, 6-1. Texas 14. New Jersey Nets GM: Matthew Mitchell Pick: Dontonio Wingfield, PF, 6-9. Cincinnati 15. Indiana Pacers GM: Richard Burton Pick: Charlie Ward, PG, 6-0. FSU 16. Golden State Warriors GM: Mike Moore Pick: Eric Montross, C, 7-0. UNC 17. Portland Trail Blazers GM: Mike Northam Pick: Jim McIlvane, C, 7-1, Marquette. Next up: 18. Milwaukee Bucks GM: Bobby Davis


Craig Simpson - Usenet Draft Commissioner