G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
94-95 Georgetown 30  967 203  520  35 151 172 250   99  78 134 133   5  89  613
95-96 Georgetown 37 1213 312  650  87 238 215 317  141  88 173 139  16 124  926
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           67 2180 515 1170 122 389 387 567  240 166 307 272  21 213 1539

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
94-95 Georgetown 32.2  39.0  23.2  68.8  3.3  4.5  4.4  0.2  3.0  20.4
95-96 Georgetown 32.8  48.0  36.6  67.8  3.8  4.7  3.8  0.4  3.4  25.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           32.5  44.0  31.4  68.3  3.6  4.6  4.1  0.3  3.2  23.0

Iverson is a very special player.  He is not a true point guard, more
of an Isiah Thomas type who can score and also dish the ball.  With
experience, Iverson should get better as a PG.

His strenghts are his quickness and overall athletic ability.  He is
an excellent defender and is adapt at getting steals (his 3.4 average
was second in the nation).  Georgetown used him in a full court
pressing game meant to totally disrupt the opponents offense.  More
often then not, it was successful.  Offensively, Iverson is great on
the break and is an excellent penetrator.

This is not to say that Iverson does not have any weaknesses.  He does
not have a very good shot (at least it is very inconsistent).  One pro
scout described him as Abdu-Raulf (of the Nuggets) *without* the jump
shot.  I take it that this means that the scout does not think that
Iverson can be a complete NBA PG.  I don't really agree with that
comparison and believe that when he grows up some, Iverson will be an
All-Star for years to come.

Iverson should be picked in the top 5.

General Info:
             First team All-American. Big East Conference Defensive
             Player of the Year.
Comments:
             Extremely fast, quick guard. Tends to play out of
             control. Has the athletic ability and confidence to
             dominate a game.
Summary:
             He'll probably be the first player selected.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
95-96 Ga Tech    36 1345 235  514  88 238 121 164  113  82 161 115   4  63  679
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           36 1345 235  514  88 238 121 164  113  82 161 115   4  63  679

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
95-96 Ga Tech    37.4  45.7  37.0  73.8  3.1  4.5  3.2  0.1  1.8  18.9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           37.4  45.7  37.0  73.8  3.1  4.5  3.2  0.1  1.8  18.9

Marbury came to Georgia Tech as the most heralded recruit in the ACC and the
most heralded Point Guard since Kenny Anderson.  He did not disappoint.
Marbury became the best player on a very, very good Georgia Tech team.  Not
only did he lead the team from the point but gave GT a defensive presence that
they have not had since Bruce Dalyriple.

His strengths are many, an excelent defender and ballhandler he can control
his offense and disrupt the opponents offense.  He is a good shooter but
is a little streaky (ie inconsistent) and must get better.  His range easily
goes to three point range.  He is a master at breaking down the defense with
his dribble and should have no trouble penetrating in the NBA.  He has great
basketball instincts.

All those wonderful strengths aside, Marbury does have some weaknesses:  He
did not have a good assist to turnover ratio, 161 to 115 (although he showed
*much* improvement at the end of the year).  He needs to bulk up some, this
was apparent the way the physical backcourt of Cincinnati dominated him in
the NCAA's.

Overall, Marbury is a special player.  Like so many he is coming out way to
soon and could use an extra year or two to mature as a person.  Given some
time he will be a star in the NBA for years to come.  He should be a top
5 pick.

General Info:
             Reminds scouts of Kenny Anderson because he's followed
             a very similar path- New York City prep phenom, who
             attends Georgia Tech, and is an early entrant in the
             N.B.A. Draft.
Comments:
             Flashy point guard, who could develop into one of the
             league's premier point guards.
Summary:
             Expected to be a top 5 pick.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 USF        29  779 124  306  23  83  59  82  108  67  68  75   2  87  330
93-94 USF        28  868 180  398  56 133  85 135  133  62  84  99   2 109  501
94-95 USF        28  974 174  456  39 143 113 151  141  57 125 122   4  80  500
95-96 USF        26  811 116  292  24  89  78 106  117  38 123  90   4  68  334
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          111 3432 594 1452 142 448 335 474  499 224 400 386  12 344 1665

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 USF        26.9  40.5  27.7  72.0  3.7  2.3  2.6  0.1  3.0  11.4
93-94 USF        31.0  45.2  42.1  63.0  4.8  3.0  3.5  0.1  3.9  17.9
94-95 USF        34.8  38.2  27.3  74.8  5.0  4.5  4.4  0.1  2.9  17.9
95-96 USF        31.2  39.7  27.0  73.6  4.5  4.7  3.5  0.2  2.6  12.8
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           30.9  40.9  31.7  70.7  4.5  3.6  3.5  0.1  3.1  15.0

Strengths: Great leaper, obvious nickname of Skywalker fits him, might 
be a hair over 6' but dunks with ease. Quick and fast and developed a 
decent outside shot while in school. Very good at getting his own 
shot. Also plays the passing lanes well, among the national leaders in 
steals while in college.

Weaknesses: He's really a SG in a PG's body, is not a good ballhandler 
and only uses the dribble to get his own shot, USF tried to play him 
at the PG but he was not very effective there at all. Has to work on 
playing straight up defense instead of just gambling for steals, has 
to become better at doing all the little things and not just making 
show-stopping plays.

Basically a great kid who's too small to play in the NBA unless his PG 
skills improve dramatically. Similar to Tony Delk of Kentucky but not 
as good of a shooter. Probably going to have to prove himself in the 
CBA for a couple of years.

Walker is 6-0, 175, and his calling card is the dunk.  He's got amazing hops 
and hangtime for a small guy, and he isn't afraid to take the ball up over the 
bigger trees when he drives the lane.  Walker suffered from a broken leg last 
year, but recovered well to play this last year.  He was the shortest player 
in the Reebok Dunk Contest televised on ESPN this year.  He has all the tools 
to be a good defender, quick mitts, decent size and strength, and great 
quickness.  It seems like he doesn't apply himself to one-on-one defending, 
but he plays the lanes as good as anyone, and this is reflected in his high 
steals totals.  His good anticipation allows him to knock away any lazy 
passes.  Offensively, he is able to burn virtually anyone with a Terrell 
Brandon like easy-quickness.  He can hit the three, but probably needs to 
develop some consistency on it.  I think his stats could have been a good deal 
higher, but Phil Matthews implemented a Cavaliers-type slowdown offense that 
held Walker back a little bit.  Gerald is a great athlete who could have a 
spectacular future in the NBA if he works hard, and of course, if he is given 
the chance.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Grayson Co                  Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Grayson Co                  Statistics Unavailable
94-95 Kansas St  27  887 123  295  41 102  74  96   95  67  82  61   3  53  361
95-96 Kansas St  27  942 139  329  48 129 116 142   93  58  89  81   3  65  442
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     54 1829 262  624  89 231 190 238  188 125 171 142   6 118  803

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Grayson Co            Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Grayson Co            Statistics Unavailable
94-95 Kansas St  32.9  41.7  40.2  77.1  3.5  3.0  2.3  0.1  2.0  13.4
95-96 Kansas St  34.9  42.2  37.2  81.7  3.4  3.3  3.0  0.1  2.4  16.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     33.9  42.0  38.5  79.8  3.5  3.2  2.6  0.1  2.2  14.9

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Arizona    28  582  44  104   7  31  22  48   52  57  94  48  12  32  117
93-94 Arizona    35 1026  94  209  27  89  45  75  131 101 122  66  21  60  260
94-95 Arizona    31  853  69  167  36  94  19  44   96  90 113  88  14  49  193
95-96 Arizona    33 1090 108  250  45 117  63  86  119 109 231 109  24  67  324
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          127 3551 315  730 115 331 149 253  398 357 560 311  71 208  894

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Arizona    20.8  42.3  22.6  45.8  1.9  3.4  1.7  0.4  1.1   4.2
93-94 Arizona    29.3  45.0  30.3  60.0  3.7  3.5  1.9  0.6  1.7   7.4
94-95 Arizona    27.5  41.3  38.3  43.2  3.1  3.6  2.8  0.5  1.6   6.2
95-96 Arizona    33.0  43.2  38.5  73.3  3.6  7.0  3.3  0.7  2.0   9.8
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           28.0  43.2  34.7  58.9  3.1  4.4  2.4  0.6  1.6   7.0

Geary is not a true point guard.  Geary *is* a great athlete and defender.
He is not going to dazzle anyone but will play hard, dive for lose balls.

Geary is not a good shooter but did show tremendous improvement on the
offensive end durning his career.

Geary had a great Nike Desert Classic leading the Midwest team with
a 15.3 average.

Reggie Geary-transition to PG this year probably made him a first
round pick.  The best defender to come out of college in ten years.
If he can't put up the offense he still stick cuz of his offense.
Showed decent range the last two years and showed very underrrated
passing and distribution skills.  Great size for a PG, 6'4", can and
will give the taller PG's in the league all they can handle with him
in their face.  Will need a few more years to truly learn the PG role
though.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Vermont    26  962 176  425  82 196 185 221   79  51 118 124   1  12  619
93-94 Vermont    26  930 205  533  68 210 209 251   66  50  99 124   1  22  687
94-95 Vermont    26  871 164  456  52 165 152 190   64  38 101  75   0  26  532
95-96 Vermont    26  955 187  500  69 201 193 229   86  51 140 102   1  27  636
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          104 3718 732 1914 271 772 739 891  295 190 458 425   3  87 2474

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Vermont    37.0  41.4  41.8  83.7  3.0  4.5  4.8  0.0  0.5  23.8
93-94 Vermont    35.8  38.5  32.4  83.3  2.5  3.8  4.8  0.0  0.8  26.4
94-95 Vermont    33.5  36.0  31.5  80.0  2.5  3.9  2.9  0.0  1.0  20.5
95-96 Vermont    36.7  37.4  34.3  84.3  3.3  5.4  3.9  0.0  1.0  24.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           35.8  38.2  35.1  82.9  2.8  4.4  4.1  0.0  0.8  23.8

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Va Tech    26  ...  45  127  16  48  18  25   34  45  42  22   3  18  124
93-94 Va Tech    28  605  86  216  39  98  36  44   56  51  53  29   6  25  247
94-95 Va Tech    35  ... 166  371  60 158  90 119  133  87 108  79  13  38  482
95-96 Va Tech    29  916 129  290  60 129  53  65   71  59  74  36  14  21  371
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          118  ... 426 1004 175 433 197 253  294 242 277 166  36 102 1224

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Va Tech    16.0  35.4  33.3  72.0  1.3  1.6  0.8  0.1  0.7   4.8
93-94 Va Tech    21.6  39.8  39.8  81.8  2.0  1.9  1.0  0.2  0.9   8.8
94-95 Va Tech    37.0  44.7  38.0  75.6  3.8  3.1  2.3  0.4  1.1  13.8
95-96 Va Tech    31.6  44.5  46.5  81.5  2.4  2.6  1.2  0.5  0.7  12.8
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS            ...  42.4  40.4  77.9  2.5  2.3  1.4  0.3  0.9  10.4

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Va Tech    28  ...  68  156  14  35  24  36   74  42  61  41   4  21  174
93-94 Va Tech    28  651  57  136   7  32  25  44   66  57  67  48  12  27  146
94-95 Va Tech    35  ... 169  315  34  74  78 124  164  89 108  81  17  56  450
95-96 Va Tech    28  810  92  191  21  58  33  46  110  52  80  41  13  37  238
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          119  ... 386  798  76 199 160 250  414 240 316 211  46 141 1008

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Va Tech    26.0  43.6  40.0  66.7  2.6  2.2  1.5  0.1  0.8   6.2
93-94 Va Tech    23.3  41.9  21.9  56.8  2.4  2.4  1.7  0.4  1.0   5.2
94-95 Va Tech    37.0  53.7  45.9  62.9  4.7  3.1  2.3  0.5  1.6  12.9
95-96 Va Tech    28.9  48.2  36.2  71.7  3.9  2.9  1.5  0.5  1.3   8.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS            ...  48.4  38.2  64.0  3.5  2.7  1.8  0.4  1.2   8.5

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Toledo     28  908 114  212  17  44  97 133  135  44  38  56   9  35  342
93-94 Toledo     27  924 143  293  21  73 108 162  178  54  98  71  11  44  415
94-95 Toledo     27  962 162  339  42 114 142 183  183  54 101  81  23  46  508
95-96 Toledo     32 1152 216  441  59 146 206 245  196  67 128  91  10  82  697
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          114 3946 635 1285 139 377 553 723  692 219 365 299  53 207 1962

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Toledo     32.4  53.8  38.6  72.9  4.8  1.4  2.0  0.3  1.3  12.2
93-94 Toledo     34.2  48.8  28.8  66.7  6.6  3.6  2.6  0.4  1.6  15.4
94-95 Toledo     35.6  47.8  36.8  77.6  6.8  3.7  3.0  0.9  1.7  18.8
95-96 Toledo     36.0  49.0  40.4  84.1  6.1  4.0  2.8  0.3  2.6  21.8
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           34.6  49.4  36.9  76.5  6.1  3.2  2.6  0.5  1.8  17.2

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 SantaClara 31  743  78  184  49 120  47  57   79  54  67  62   4  26  252
93-94 SantaClara 26  778 122  295  67 168  69  83   65  57  95  74   1  34  380
94-95 SantaClara 27  902 164  369  84 185 153 174  102  53 174 113   2  48  565
95-96 SantaClara 29  979 164  381  63 183 101 113  103  43 174 103   0  39  492
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          113 3402 528 1229 263 656 370 427  349 207 510 352   7 147 1689

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 SantaClara 24.0  42.4  40.8  82.5  2.5  2.2  2.0  0.1  0.8   8.1
93-94 SantaClara 29.9  41.4  39.9  83.1  2.5  3.7  2.8  0.0  1.3  14.6
94-95 SantaClara 33.4  44.4  45.4  87.9  3.8  6.4  4.2  0.1  1.8  20.9
95-96 SantaClara 33.8  43.0  34.4  89.4  3.6  6.0  3.6  0.0  1.3  17.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           30.1  43.0  40.1  86.7  3.1  4.5  3.1  0.1  1.3  14.9

Nash started off the year in a big way leading Santa Clara to a huge upset of
defending national champs UCLA.  He is a great ballhandler and showed surprising
quickness at the Desert Classic pre-draft camp.  He is a very good shooter whose
stats went down for his senior year.  This is due to having to force so much playing
on a relatively weak team.

Nash really, really helped himself at the Desert Classic and will be the 3rd or
4th point guard chosen (depending on who all comes out).

        One of the greatest players ever to emerge from the ranks of Candian
high school ranks, Nash has been the starting PG for the Candian National
Senior team the past two years. Nash, a gifted athlete who emigrated to
Victoria, B.C. as a youngster from South Africa, also starred as a soccer
player on the B.C. provincial team as a youth. His brother Martin is a star
striker on the Canadian National U-23 soccer team. He first gained national
recognition as a freshman at Santa Clara, the only Division I school to
recruit him, when his clutch free throws at the end of regulation helped
knock of #2 seed Arizona in the NCAA tournament.  

        Nash is a natural point guard who can distribute the ball
effectively and hit the long-range jumper. He uses deceptive quickness and a
superior understanding of the game to his advantage. Like all of the great
point guards, Nash has uncanny court vision and a sixth sense for the game.
He may be the best *true* point guard in the draft.

        Steve's biggest weakness is his man-to-man defense. His average foot
speed makes him an easy target for small, quick point guards to blow by. His
lack of physical strength does not bode well for handling the bigger,
stronger point guards in the NBA in the post.

Strengths: Nash is the epitome of a gym rat, good shooter, can dribble the
ball and is an excellent passer. Smart and very competitive, knows his
limitations and uses what he has. Improved every year at Santa Clara.

Weaknesses: Not slow but not quick, improving but still a poor defender,
had trouble getting his own shot against quality opponents. Played in
Canada and thus is still adjusting to the level of play in the US.
Sometimes Nash forgets what's a good shot and what's not.

Comments: Another kid you have to like, late first rounder who could move
up, the comparisons to Stockton are skin deep, nowhere near as quick. Has
to improve his defense, played a lot of zone in college which could hurt
him in the NBA.

General Info:
             A native of Canada.
Comments:
             Good shooter, good ballhandler, and a good passer.
Summary:
             His solid showing at the Nike Desert Classic,
             solidified his status as a top 20 pick.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Tulane     29  529  52  135   9  30  59  83   41  65 120  70   0  56  172
92-93 Tulane     31  893  86  224  25  84 104 152   89  75 167 114   2  90  301
93-94 Tulane     26  572  38  104   5  33  47  72   52  55 102  73   0  49  128
94-95 McNeese St                  Did Not Play - Transfer Student
95-96 McNeese St 27  962  98  263  42 135  87 134  109  80 195 112  10 118  325
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          113 2956 274  726  81 282 297 441  291 275 584 369  12 313  926

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Tulane     18.2  38.5  30.0  71.1  1.4  4.1  2.4  0.0  1.9   5.9
92-93 Tulane     28.8  38.4  29.8  68.4  2.9  5.4  3.7  0.1  2.9   9.7
93-94 Tulane     22.0  36.5  15.2  65.3  2.0  3.9  2.8  0.0  1.9   4.9
94-95 McNeese St            Did Not Play - Transfer Student
95-96 McNeese St 35.6  37.3  31.1  64.9  4.0  7.2  4.1  0.4  4.4  12.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           26.2  37.7  28.7  67.3  2.6  5.2  3.3  0.1  2.8   8.2

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 JMU        30  346  39   78  11  27  49  61   12  30  30  38   0  16  138
93-94 JMU        30  699  96  213  42 100  74  92   50  46  59  44   2  22  308
94-95 JMU        28  983 127  274  62 145  91 107   85  59  94  67   1  35  407
95-96 JMU        29 1084 204  485 118 287 120 141   63  66  86  72   2  48  646
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          117 3112 466 1050 233 559 334 401  210 201 269 221   5 121 1499

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 JMU        11.5  50.0  40.7  80.3  0.4  1.0  1.3  0.0  0.5   4.6
93-94 JMU        23.3  45.1  42.0  80.4  1.7  2.0  1.5  0.1  0.7  10.3
94-95 JMU        35.1  46.4  42.8  85.0  3.0  3.4  2.4  0.0  1.3  14.5
95-96 JMU        37.4  42.1  41.1  85.1  2.2  3.0  2.5  0.1  1.7  22.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           26.6  44.4  41.7  83.3  1.8  2.3  1.9  0.0  1.0  12.8

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Riverside                   Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Riverside                   Statistics Unavailable
94-95 Cal-Irvine 29  975 109  259  61 153  87 117   98  72 245 123   3  29  366
95-96 Cal-Irvine 27  996 109  261  67 160  91 115   78  68 230 107   3  40  376
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           56 1971 218  520 128 313 178 232  176 140 475 230   6  69  742

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Riverside             Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Riverside             Statistics Unavailable
94-95 Cal-Irvine 33.6  42.1  39.9  74.4  3.4  8.4  4.2  0.1  1.0  12.6
95-96 Cal-Irvine 36.9  41.8  41.9  79.1  2.9  8.5  4.0  0.1  1.5  13.9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           35.2  41.9  40.9  76.7  3.1  8.5  4.1  0.1  1.2  13.3

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Georgia    20  148   7   16   3   7   9  19   16  12  29  20   1   8   26
93-94 Georgia    30  370  28   58  11  31   4   8   39  31  56  55   0  31   71
94-95 Georgia    27  899  53  142  20  66  39  55  108  62 169  80   3  46  165
95-96 Georgia    30  840  95  194  48 108  24  34   99  55 145  66   1  56  262
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          107 2257 183  410  82 212  76 116  262 160 399 221   5 141  524

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Georgia     7.4  43.8  42.9  47.4  0.8  1.5  1.0  0.1  0.4   1.3
93-94 Georgia    12.3  48.3  35.5  50.0  1.3  1.9  1.8  0.0  1.0   2.4
94-95 Georgia    33.3  37.3  30.3  70.9  4.0  6.3  3.0  0.1  1.7   6.1
95-96 Georgia    28.0  49.0  44.4  70.6  3.3  4.8  2.2  0.0  1.9   8.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           21.1  44.6  38.7  65.5  2.4  3.7  2.1  0.0  1.3   4.9

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
93-94 UConn      34 1036 142  280  50 123  72  98  128  87 164  87   7  79  406
94-95 UConn      33  954 121  302  38 104  85 113  155  76 183 103   2  50  365
95-96 UConn      35 1116 182  423  95 234 101 119  169  68 212 108  13  65  560
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          102 3106 445 1005 183 461 258 330  452 231 559 298  22 194 1331

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
93-94 UConn      30.5  50.7  40.7  73.5  3.8  4.8  2.6  0.2  2.3  11.9
94-95 UConn      28.9  40.1  36.5  75.2  4.7  5.5  3.1  0.1  1.5  11.1
95-96 UConn      31.9  43.0  40.6  84.9  4.8  6.1  3.1  0.4  1.9  16.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           30.5  44.3  39.7  78.2  4.4  5.5  2.9  0.2  1.9  13.0

Sheffer is a tall point guard.  I hate to list this as strength but it is a nice
thing to have in a point guard (especially in the NBA's Eastern conference).  He
has a nice shooting touch to go along with great ballhandling skills.  He is an
older player (24 years old) because of serving three years in the israeli army.
This might be a plus.  With rookies being able to bolt after only three years,
a more mature rookie might be able to help more now instead of waiting for him
to grow up.  During his junior year, Sheffer experienced a shooting slump which
made him reluctant to shoot.  This year he was much more aggressive, shooting
130 more threes (and making 95).

He did play in the Desert Classic and should be drafted in the late first round
or early in the second.

His main strengths are his shooting ability, his ball control, but
most of all his court vision.  Sheffer is a smart player, who can
handle the responsibility that comes with the point guard position.
He take the shots when the shotclock winds down and usually makes
them.  He is a player you can count on, and is very useful and
responsible at running the offense..  His main weakness is his lack of
speed.  This could cause trouble at guarding fast small point guards.
Sheffer is big, and can guard up to small forwards, and thus makes up
for this weakness...  He needs to be given help in 1 on 1 defense, but
is a solid late first rounder...  Look for him to go to the knicks in
the seconds first round pick...

I dont have to tell you how good a ballplayer he is, but his
intangibles are one of his biggest strengths.  While 21 years old, he
led his team in israel (hapoel galil-elion) to the national
championship, and by that breaking an increadible streak of 23
consecutive championships, held by maccabi tel aviv (maccabi has also
won the last three years, since sheffer left).  He served in the
israeli army, is the starting point guard of the israeli national
team, and has a lot of international experience. he has played with
and against some former and future nba players. he is a very tough
minded and determined person, and i say that also by knowing his
brother and few of his friends. by going away to play in college he
gave up a lot of money (about 1 million dollars) he would have earned,
had he stay in europe, since being the best player in israel.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 UALR       27  749  57  138   9  31  71  92   89  71  92  50   3  39  194
93-94 UALR       28  888  94  212  23  55  72  93  109  90 102  72   0  45  283
94-95 UALR       27  938 153  382  43 113 130 180  135  61 124  70   7  44  479
95-96 UALR       30 1080 128  312  51 133 128 171  155  64 155  81   2  56  435
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          112 3655 432 1044 126 332 401 536  488 286 473 273  12 184 1391

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 UALR       27.7  41.3  29.0  77.2  3.3  3.4  1.9  0.1  1.4   7.2
93-94 UALR       31.7  44.3  41.8  77.4  3.9  3.6  2.6  0.0  1.6  10.1
94-95 UALR       34.7  40.1  38.1  72.2  5.0  4.6  2.6  0.3  1.6  17.7
95-96 UALR       36.0  41.0  38.3  74.9  5.2  5.2  2.7  0.1  1.9  14.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           32.6  41.4  38.0  74.8  4.4  4.2  2.4  0.1  1.6  12.4

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Ga Tech                     Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Ga Tech    30  806  80  171  25  78  33  41  102  41 164  91   9  42  218
93-94 Ga Tech    24  787  61  145  27  81  45  58   82  48 141  64   6  40  194
94-95 Ga Tech    27  966 119  232  50 117  73  97  131  53 181  81  13  46  361
95-96 Ga Tech    36 1351 149  367  77 209 105 133  167  68 238 130  13  65  480
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          117 3910 409  915 179 485 256 329  482 210 724 366  41 193 1253

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Ga Tech               Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Ga Tech    26.9  46.8  32.1  80.5  3.4  5.5  3.0  0.3  1.4   7.3
93-94 Ga Tech    32.8  42.1  33.3  77.6  3.4  5.9  2.7  0.3  1.7   8.1
94-95 Ga Tech    35.8  51.3  42.7  75.3  4.9  6.7  3.0  0.5  1.7  13.4
95-96 Ga Tech    37.5  40.6  36.8  78.9  4.6  6.6  3.6  0.4  1.8  13.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           33.4  44.7  36.9  77.8  4.1  6.2  3.1  0.4  1.6  10.7

Drew came to Georgia Tech very much unheralded.  After a
redshirt first year, Barry earned a spot in Techs starting lineup and
immediately impressed everyone with his basketball instincts and
passing skills.  Barry was a four year starter and lead the ACC in
assists for 3 straight years.

Barry's strengths are of course his passing skills.  The no look pass
is forte and is able to thread the needle on the break or when
penetrating the defense.  He is a good, but very streaky shooter.
Barry was listed as the shooting guard but he actually played a lot of
point with the point guard (Best and Marburry) moved to scoring guard.

The weaknesses are his strength (he will need to get stronger in the
pros) and his defense.  His shooting can be way to streaky and he
needs to become more consistent (a 36% 3p% and 40% overall is to low).

Barry was overlooked at times thoughout his career and usally made
teams pay for the oversight.  Barry will probably be a lower first
round pick (this may change depending on how he does in camps), and
has a chance to be a solid NBA player.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 S Florida  27  867  94  221  41 101  46  72   93  51 108  83   2  26  275
93-94 S Florida  26  787  96  269  37 134  70  94   62  48 105  65   1  19  299
94-95 S Florida  30 1067 161  389  84 219  98 131   96  55 196 100   1  35  504
95-96 S Florida  28 1064 175  405  82 220 109 141   85  54 111  92   7  35  541
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          111 3785 526 1284 244 674 323 438  336 208 520 340  11 115 1619

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 S Florida  32.1  42.5  40.6  63.9  3.4  4.0  3.1  0.1  1.0  10.2
93-94 S Florida  30.3  35.7  27.6  74.5  2.4  4.0  2.5  0.0  0.7  11.5
94-95 S Florida  35.6  41.4  38.4  74.8  3.2  6.5  3.3  0.0  1.2  16.8
95-96 S Florida  38.0  43.2  37.3  77.3  3.0  4.0  3.3  0.3  1.3  19.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           34.1  41.0  36.2  73.7  3.0  4.7  3.1  0.1  1.0  14.6

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Pittsburgh 33  650  71  184  30  82  73 116   53  76  88  64   9  47  245
92-93 Pittsburgh 28  992 124  322  48 164 132 171  106  82  56  90  10  64  428
93-94 Pittsburgh 25  881  93  240  36 105 111 153  100  63 175  92   7  70  333
94-95 Pittsburgh                  Did Not Play - Redshirted
95-96 Pittsburgh 25  815  90  262  38 126 118 157  101  79 133  61  11  76  336
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          111 3338 378 1008 152 477 434 597  360 300 452 307  37 257 1342

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Pittsburgh 19.7  38.6  36.6  62.9  1.6  2.7  1.9  0.3  1.4   7.4
92-93 Pittsburgh 35.4  38.5  29.3  77.2  3.8  2.0  3.2  0.4  2.3  15.3
93-94 Pittsburgh 35.2  38.8  34.3  72.5  4.0  7.0  3.7  0.3  2.8  13.3
94-95 Pittsburgh            Did Not Play - Redshirted
95-96 Pittsburgh 32.6  34.4  30.2  75.2  4.0  5.3  2.4  0.4  3.0  13.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           30.1  37.5  31.9  72.7  3.2  4.1  2.8  0.3  2.3  12.1

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Maryland   28  384  22   76   7  27  31  43   31  44  67  55   2  19   82
93-94 Maryland   30  999 115  237  38  88  87 111   77  72 136  94   3  45  355
94-95 Maryland   34 1110 106  238  40 105 106 126   72  73 162  96  10  28  358
95-96 Maryland   27  780  98  214  45 100  87 103   66  65 118  80   1  28  328
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          119 3273 341  765 130 320 311 383  246 254 483 325  16 120 1123

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Maryland   13.7  28.9  25.9  72.1  1.1  2.4  2.0  0.1  0.7   2.9
93-94 Maryland   33.3  48.5  43.2  78.4  2.6  4.5  3.1  0.1  1.5  11.8
94-95 Maryland   32.6  44.5  38.1  84.1  2.1  4.8  2.8  0.3  0.8  10.5
95-96 Maryland   28.9  45.8  45.0  84.5  2.4  4.4  3.0  0.0  1.0  12.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           27.5  44.6  40.6  81.2  2.1  4.1  2.7  0.1  1.0   9.4

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Duke       29  367  56  139  37  85  20  32   33  26  34  23   0  15  169
93-94 Duke       34 1056 110  275  76 202  45  63   68  52  77  50   1  41  341
94-95 Duke       28  450  36  121  17  73  20  26   31  48  48  29   0  15  109
95-96 Duke       29 1002 155  332  79 179  83 115  111  58 132  73   2  37  472
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          120 2875 357  867 209 539 168 236  243 184 291 175   3 108 1091

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Duke       12.7  40.3  43.5  62.5  1.1  1.2  0.8  0.0  0.5   5.8
93-94 Duke       31.1  40.0  37.6  71.4  2.0  2.3  1.5  0.0  1.2  10.0
94-95 Duke       16.1  29.8  23.3  76.9  1.1  1.7  1.0  0.0  0.5   3.9
95-96 Duke       34.6  46.7  44.1  72.2  3.8  4.6  2.5  0.1  1.3  16.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           24.0  41.2  38.8  71.2  2.0  2.4  1.5  0.0  0.9   9.1

Chris Collins came to Duke as a heralded high school ALL-American...He 
helped to contribute to Duke's National Championship bids his freshman 
and sophomore years.  However, he was only able to start 3 games during 
his junior year due to an ankle injury.  His senior year was a major 
turnaround.  He helped provide Duke's offense with a longe range threat 
as well as provided his team with a fiery and emotional leader.  

His greatest strengths have proven to be his 3 point shooting 
ability/jump shot, and the great energy and excitement he brings to his team.

However, Chris is only a one dimensional player.  He has difficulty 
dribbling out of traps and lacks a quick first step.  Often times he 
relies too heavily on himself and does not make rational decisions such 
as forcing jump shots. (as demonstrated by the end of the Duke/Michigan game)
  
Since he is currently recuperating from surgery on his right ankle that 
he re-injured during the home finale against UNC, Chris did not have a 
chance to showcase his talents at either of the pre-draft camps.   

What role can Chris Collins hope to play in the NBA?  Perhaps he can hook 
on with an NBA team (Pistons??) performing in a role similar to what 
Steve Kerr does for the Chicago Bulls mainly as their 3 point 
specialist.

Defensively:
	Chris will have a difficult time matching up man-to-man against 
NBA Point Guards.  Againts the quicker guards such as Georgia Tech's 
Marbury, Collins seemed a good step slower and against the taller Jeff 
Mcginnis of UNC, Chris could not contest his shot.  Chris plays with 
heart and determination, but His limited athletic ability will make it 
difficult for him to make an impact defensively.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Vanderbilt 34  611  45  112  30  70  32  44   54  45  55  46   3  32  152
93-94 Vanderbilt 30  799  76  181  54 125  43  57   77  52 102  37   3  43  249
94-95 Vanderbilt 28  976 116  271  83 195  41  58  104  56 114  54   4  73  356
95-96 Vanderbilt 32 1202 170  407 103 272  80 108   89  67 176  70   2  63  523
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          124 3588 407  971 270 662 196 267  324 220 447 207  12 211 1280

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Vanderbilt 18.0  40.2  42.9  72.7  1.6  1.6  1.4  0.1  0.9   4.5
93-94 Vanderbilt 26.6  42.0  43.2  75.4  2.6  3.4  1.2  0.1  1.4   8.3
94-95 Vanderbilt 34.9  42.8  42.6  70.7  3.7  4.1  1.9  0.1  2.6  12.7
95-96 Vanderbilt 37.6  41.8  37.9  74.1  2.8  5.5  2.2  0.1  2.0  16.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           28.9  41.9  40.8  73.4  2.6  3.6  1.7  0.1  1.7  10.3

Frank Seckar came to Vanderbilt a relatively unheralded player out 
of Oshkosh, Wisconsin and quickly became a fan favorite, a reliable 
bench scorer, and by his junior year, the Commodore's team leader. 
Playing behind Billy McCaffrey his freshman and sophomore years, he 
concentrated primarily on providing the team a dependable ball 
handler and tough perimeter defender--two skills McCaffrey 
lacked--and those skills should earn him a look from NBA teams in 
need of backup point guards.

Seckar is an outstanding outside shooter who exhibited NBA range 
early in his career. He had several games in which he was almost 
perfect from behind the three-point line. He's also quick, sees the 
floor well, and plays tough one-on-one perimeter defense. Size is 
his principal liability.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Syracuse                    Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Syracuse   20  148   9   26   0   7   3   9   11   9  23  22   0   9   21
93-94 Syracuse   26  251  11   46   2  16  10  13   29  14  50  26   1  14   34
94-95 Syracuse   30  440  35   66  10  29   9  19   43  46  78  37   1  26   89
95-96 Syracuse   38 1352  75  172  26  72  65  87  139  74 281 123   5  55  241
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          114 2191 130  310  38 124  87 128  222 143 432 208   7 104  385

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Syracuse              Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Syracuse    7.4  34.6   0.0  33.3  0.6  1.2  1.1  0.0  0.5   1.1
93-94 Syracuse    9.7  23.9  12.5  76.9  1.1  1.9  1.0  0.0  0.5   1.3
94-95 Syracuse   14.7  53.0  34.5  47.4  1.4  2.6  1.2  0.0  0.9   3.0
95-96 Syracuse   35.6  43.6  36.1  74.7  3.7  7.4  3.2  0.1  1.4   6.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           19.2  41.9  30.6  68.0  1.9  3.8  1.8  0.1  0.9   3.4

Z, as he is often referred to, is a true point guard whose 
biggest asset is his tenacity and drive. He stepped into the starting 
position in this past year after Michael Lloyd's sudden departure and 
silenced his critics with solid game after another. He is a great passer 
who does not really like to shoot, but he can hit the three when needed, 
shooting a 37% clip from the arc. As said before, his tenacity is his 
biggest asset, as he played most of the Big East tournament with a badly 
sprained knee.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Tulane     31  739  95  231  26  83  44  74   68  59  47  68   8  37  260
93-94 Tulane     27  731 122  259  17  58  74  92   70  42  51  68   4  26  335
94-95 Tulane     33 1156 155  363  34  92 110 150  111  60 131 109  12  62  454
95-96 Tulane     32 1076 136  305  41 108  89 113  127  62 119  89  10  64  402
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          123 3702 508 1158 118 341 317 429  376 223 348 334  34 189 1451

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Tulane     23.8  41.1  31.3  59.5  2.2  1.5  2.2  0.3  1.2   8.4
93-94 Tulane     27.1  47.1  29.3  80.4  2.6  1.9  2.5  0.1  1.0  12.4
94-95 Tulane     35.0  42.7  37.0  73.3  3.4  4.0  3.3  0.4  1.9  13.8
95-96 Tulane     33.6  44.6  38.0  78.8  4.0  3.7  2.8  0.3  2.0  12.6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           30.1  43.9  34.6  73.9  3.1  2.8  2.7  0.3  1.5  11.8

  LeVeldro does two things very well: (1) he plays nonstop, brutal,
stifiling defense, and (2) given room on the perimiter, he will
drive the paint until the defense closes, then pull WAAAY up and
stick the nice J.  It's pretty safe to say that he does both of
these things at the NBA level.

  So why is he a probable second-rounder/free agent?  Because there
are holes in his game.  At the point, he's effective and reliable
but not a dazzling playmaker.  At the two, he's not aggresive enough
looking to score.  A classic "combo guard," though his ballhandling
is solid which is a plus.

  What can he do for an NBA team?  Probably provide a lot of solid
backup minutes at the point for a team that doesn't rely too heavily
on playmaking from the one spot.  Because he's such a terrific
defender, he can hold his own with just about anyone.  Unless his
disposition changes remarkably, he'll probably never be a 20 ppg 
scorer, but he can give you 7-10 ppg and hold the opposing point to
about that too.

  Simmons is probably not a "hidden superstar," but he is a pretty
much no-risk solid backup at the point.  Whether he's drafted likely
depends on the philosophy of the teams picking in the mid-to-late
second round.  If everyone's trying to be Jerry West, then LeVeldro
will probably have to go the FA route.  If someone is satisfied with
picking up a backup player with a late second round pick, he'll be
an attractive choice.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
93-94 LSU                         Did Not Play - Redshirted
94-95 LSU        16  550  81  185  20  65  42  62   64  39 151  86   3  40  224
95-96 LSU        13  318  24   83   1  20  30  38   30  23  69  37   2  27   79
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           29  868 105  268  21  85  72 100   94  62 220 123   5  67  303

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
93-94 LSU                   Did Not Play - Redshirted
94-95 LSU        34.4  43.8  30.8  67.7  4.0  9.4  5.4  0.2  2.5  14.0
95-96 LSU        24.5  28.9   5.0  78.9  2.3  5.3  2.8  0.2  2.1   6.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           29.9  39.2  24.7  72.0  3.2  7.6  4.2  0.2  2.3  10.4

Strengths: Has an uncanny ability to sense the game, knows where everybody
is and delivers an accurate catchable pass every time. Can shoot, create
his own shot and makes his teammates better. Excellent anticipator on
defense, has good size and strength.

Weaknesses: Who knows if he'll ever get back from the knee problems? Right
now he's lost a couple of steps and has problems covering the lost
athletic ability. Played very little in college with the injuries.

Comments: Great upside if he can overcome the injuries, but an ACL, a
cracked kneecap and a torn patellar tendon have really set him back.
Gamble but on talent alone he's the best player in the draft. Has the
ability to get Roy Navaree and I to actually agree on something!

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
93-94 N Carolina 35  512  70  153  27  65  30  47   58  31  85  50   0  26  197
94-95 N Carolina 34 1165 155  316  44 112  66  99  138  74 180  72   0  44  420
95-96 N Carolina 31 1068 178  409  67 171  88 110   81  72 170  78   0  38  511
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          100 2745 403  878 138 348 184 256  277 177 435 200   0 108 1128

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
93-94 N Carolina 14.6  45.8  41.5  63.8  1.7  2.4  1.4  0.0  0.7   5.6
94-95 N Carolina 34.3  49.1  39.3  66.7  4.1  5.3  2.1  0.0  1.3  12.4
95-96 N Carolina 34.5  43.5  39.2  80.0  2.6  5.5  2.5  0.0  1.2  16.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           27.5  45.9  39.7  71.9  2.8  4.4  2.0  0.0  1.1  11.3

Jeff McInnis established himself as a top-flight and at times
dominant point guard in the ACC during the 1995 and 1996 seasons,
yet lingering questions regarding his attitude, the circumstances
of his early departure from North Carolina, and overall talent
level make him a major x-factor in the 96 draft. McInnis's strength
is in his overall ballhandling abilities and decision-making at the
point; in both 1995 and 1996 he led starting ACC point guards in
assist-turnover ratio. At 6-4, 190 pounds, and a substantial amount
of muscle, McInnis was able to easily penetrate into the paint at
the college level, but while his size will still be slightly above
average for an NBA point guard, what was a major advantage in
college should be all but neutralized at the next level. McInnis is
a good shooter with streaky tendencies and a good sense of when to
go for the jugular, having hit numerous clutch jumpers in the late
moments of games at UNC; but at times in 1996 McInnis also clearly
forced his own shot to his team's detriment. He should have no
problem adjusting to NBA 3 point line, but needs to make his foul
shooting more reliable. Defensively, McInnis is a fine on the ball
defender--one of his career highlights is a game saving strip of
Cavaliers guard Bob Sura in a two point victory over Florida State
in 1995--but was not considered particularly strong on help in
Carolina's team defense, in guarding his man away from the ball, or
in generating steals. Moreover, with average speed and quickness,
there is serious doubt as to whether McInnis will be able to keep
up with the Paytons and Packs, and this may well be the most
important reason it is difficult to project McInnis as being more
than a lifer backup--albeit perhaps a very good one--in the NBA.
McInnis is an excellent rebounder for a point guard.

Psychologically, McInnis at his best is a driven competitor with a
great deal of self-confidence and sizable helping of swagger on the
court, well-respected by his teammates, and capable of dominant
performances as in the UNC games this at Duke and against New
Orleans in the NCAA tournament. On the other hand, in 1996 McInnis
also showed that he does not yet handle losing and frustration very
well, as he pushed his habitual complaints about officiating over
the edge more than once for costly technicals. For this reason, a
rebuilding NBA team on the way up would likely be wise to pass on
McInnis--it's hard to imagine the Charlotte native prospering in a
losing situation. On the other hand, a top-flight team in need of
reserve help at the point (Seattle and Orlando come to mind, and
McInnis could certainly give a Howard Eisley of Utah a run for his
job) might do well to take a young, emotional player with a lot of
heart and a lot to learn.

General Info:
             Probably the best point guard at North Carolina
             since Kenny Smith.
Comments:
             Good defender, who has good size for a point guard.
Summary:
             Projects to a late-first round pick. Would be an
             excellent pick for Chicago at #29.