G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Syracuse   29  863 130  247   0   1  61  85  221  75  38  92  39  34  321
93-94 Syracuse   30  979 164  290   0   2 121 159  270  90  50  93  52  28  449
94-95 Syracuse   30  990 197  335   4  14 106 156  245  80  77  91  55  39  504
95-96 Syracuse   38 1378 293  599  37  88 222 291  329  94  90 122  63  44  845
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          127 4210 784 1471  41 105 510 691 1065 339 255 398 209 145 2119

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Syracuse   29.8  52.6   0.0  71.8  7.6  1.3  3.2  1.3  1.2  11.1
93-94 Syracuse   32.6  56.6   0.0  76.1  9.0  1.7  3.1  1.7  0.9  15.0
94-95 Syracuse   33.0  58.8  28.6  67.9  8.2  2.6  3.0  1.8  1.3  16.8
95-96 Syracuse   36.3  48.9  42.0  76.3  8.7  2.4  3.2  1.7  1.2  22.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           33.1  53.3  39.0  73.8  8.4  2.0  3.1  1.6  1.1  16.7

A quick forward who played power forward at Syracuse, he'd 
play the 3 most likely in the pro's. Last summer he was knocked because 
he didn't have much of a outside shot so he worked on that in the 
offseason and improved drastically. He made 34 of 84 three pointers this 
year after making only about 3 in his first 3 years. Got great quickness, 
plays a bit smaller than his height at times, but is also a good 
rebounder. Good passer (as evidenced by that touchdown pass to Jason 
Cippola in the memorable Georgia NCAA game) and clutch shot maker (as 
evidenced by the game winning three pointer in that same game).

        A player whose stock was most helped by a strong showing in the NCAA
tournament. Wallace made the much publicized decision to return to Syracuse
for his senior season and really imrpoved his game. He can now hit the
long-range jump shot and create his own shot off the dribble. Also on the
plus side, Wallace is a strong rebounder who likes to mix it up underneath
the basket. His character and leadership are also worth a mention.

        On the negative side, Wallace doesn't really appear to fit a
position in the NBA. He's a tweener -- not tall enough to play the PF spot
and not quick enough to guard small forwards in the NBA. From that
standpoint, Wallace reminds me a lot of Ed O'Bannon from last year's draft
and might find his transition to the NBA to be a rocky one. If Wallace is
going to move to the 3-spot, he must also improve his ball-handling and passing.

        My personal feeling is that Wallace might be better served trying to
bulk up and make it as a smaller power forward in the NBA. He might be able
to take NBA power forwards away from the basket and use his finesse game.
But as it stands, he simply isn't quick enough to guards NBA small forwards.

General Info:
             Led Syracuse to the National Championship Game.
Comments:
             Has developed into prototype small forward. Not
             only increased shooting range, but he's a capable
             ballhandler as well. 
Summary:
             Wallace may not be selected as high as he deserves
             to be, but he'll be a top 10 pick.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
94-95 Kentucky   33  479  95  227  17  55  52  73  148  62  47  59   8  28  259
95-96 Kentucky   36  972 228  492   9  48  82 130  302  85 104  89  25  61  547
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           69 1451 323  719  26 103 134 203  450 147 151 148  33  89  806

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
94-95 Kentucky   14.5  41.9  30.9  71.2  4.5  1.4  1.8  0.2  0.8   7.8
95-96 Kentucky   27.0  46.3  18.8  63.1  8.4  2.9  2.5  0.7  1.7  15.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           21.0  44.9  25.2  66.0  6.5  2.2  2.1  0.5  1.3  11.7

Antoine can handle the ball well for a small forward. But too small
for the power forward spot. Has range from the college 3pt. line.
Can and will pass the ball. In his sophmore season was finally becoming
the player Pitino thought he would be. Plays defense well.

Strenghts - Does everything well
Weakness  - Doesn't excel in anything

        The 2nd best player on Kentucky last season, Antoine Walker started
        to blossom into a superstar his sophomore season.  A big-time
        recruit out of Chicago, Antoine Walker was annointed the next
        Jamal Mashburn his freshman season, even wearing Mashburn's #24
        uniform number.  Who could you blame for the comparisons -- Walker
        had the all-around game, the offensive explosiveness, the ability to
        play inside and outside.  His freshman year saw him play mostly
        a supporting role, until the SEC tournament where he really shone
        and was named Tournament MVP.  But last season he really started to
        live up to the expectations that were set upon him.

        As stated previously, Antoine Walker (like several Kentucky players)
        has a well-diversified game with multiple skills, especially
        offensively.  Walker can flat out score, and gets his points from
        a variety of ways.  He is a dangerous mid-range shooter, and can
        also take the ball to the hole very well, and can finish in a variety
        of ways (as shown by his drive past Erik Dampier this season, while
        switching to his left hand for the layup to avoid the shot block).
        While not a big-time leaper, Walker is an excellent finisher.  Walker
        has a tremendous inside game and takes the ball to the basket very
        strong, with no regard to who his defender is.  While this is quite
        effective most of the time, sometimes it's as if he thinks he's
        playing back in high school, and can sometimes can get him in
        trouble against a taller player.  If there's one kink in the armor
        of Walker's offensive game though, it's his outside shooting.  After
        a freshman season in which he showed some potential from deep, his
        sophomore season was very forgettable from 3-pt land.  He never
        showed the range nor consistency all season.  His form even looked
        funny, often times it looks like a flat, shotput-like missle hurled
        towards the basket.  It's certainly something that Walker will need
        to work on for the pros.

        To complement his scoring, Antoine Walker is also a nice passer and
        ball-handler.  He finished 2nd on the team in assists behind point
        guard Anthony Epps, and often times had some very special-looking
        passes to teamates for easy hoops.  Like teammate Walter McCarty,
        Walker is an excellent interior passer.  He also has a tremendous
        handle, and often after getting the defensive rebound, would take
        the ball up the court himself and set up a teammate for the score.
        Defensively, Walker can be a terror when motivated.  He often was
        the lead man in Kentucky's press, as he guarded the man out of
        bounds.  He has quick hands, which often leads to steals (where he
        finished tied for 2nd on the team) and instant fast breaks.  Walker
        also has some pretty nice rebounding skills, and led the team in
        that department last season.  He is capable of putting up double
        doubles at times.

        On a negative note however, Walker does seem to be more of a "me
        first" type of player.  His early declaration for the NBA draft
        somewhat reflected that (along with his family situation).  While he
        did fit into Pitino's team concept at UK, sometimes it did seem like
        Walker would sulk if things weren't working out for him, much like
        how former UK player Rodrick Rhodes would do.  Coming out of
        HS, Walker was known as a notorious trash talker, and while he never
        really showed that at UK, he does have a reputation.  This baggage
        really is rather minor, however, as the fact he did fit into the
        team concept at UK and didn't hinder at all (and in fact, was a major
        player) in Kentucky's national championship run.

        While Walker played a lot of PF (and sometimes C) at Kentucky --
        mostly due to necessity -- his position is firmly at SF for the NBA.
        Sizewise and game-wise, it's a perfect fit.  Teams will be able to
        utilize his low-post game in their schemes to their advantage.  He
        may see some time at PF in an emergency.  If he improves his outside
        shot enough, Walker may very well end up seeing a lot of time at
        SG, considering his ball-handling skills.

        The fact that Antoine Walker left early for the draft during his
        Kentucky career didn't surprise UK fans -- the fact he did it after
        his sophomore year did.  But considering the fact that he's projected
        as a lottery pick, who can blame him.  Antoine Walker will likely
        be the 2nd SF taken in the draft, after John Wallace.

General Info:
             All SEC selection, who helped the Wildcats win the
             National Championship.
Comments:
             Exceptional passer. Walker has a good all-around
             game. Can create for himself or teammates.
Summary:
             Will likely be selected in the top 10.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
93-94 NE Miss    29  841 291  574  34 131 115 191  326  81  34  71  77  66  731
94-95 NE Miss    32 1031 352  711  29 123 184 287  425  96  77 105  54  62  917
95-96 Miss St    33 1007 198  418  24  81  64  86  225  93  63  74  31  37  484
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     33 1007 198  418  24  81  64  86  225  93  63  74  31  37  484

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
93-94 NE Miss    29.0  50.7  26.0  60.2 11.2  1.2  2.4  2.7  2.3  25.2
94-95 NE Miss    32.2  49.5  23.6  64.1 13.3  2.4  3.3  1.7  1.9  28.7
95-96 Miss St    30.5  47.4  29.6  74.4  6.8  1.9  2.2  0.9  1.1  14.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     30.5  47.4  29.6  74.4  6.8  1.9  2.2  0.9  1.1  14.7

General Info:
             Junior College All-American prior to joining the
             Bulldogs.
Comments:
             Following a mediocre regular season, Jones elevated
             his play during the post-season. He helped M.S.U.
             reach the Final Four.
Summary:
             Capable of being a go-to guy, Jones should be
             selected mid-first round.

I only know what I read, but after his workout in boston, the people 
there agreed with Tom Kertes and other experts that the guy has 
superstar potential -- "the whole package" and is a sure thing from 
the shoulders down.  He is known as a headcase, however, and has 
already gone through three agents.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Oklahoma   31  427  52  120   9  21  32  48   85  66  32  24   8  21  145
93-94 Oklahoma   25  759 148  297  30  78  80 106  184  98  45  47  16  49  406
94-95 Oklahoma   32 1168 260  535  69 176 167 203  269 112  69  78  22  70  756
95-96 Oklahoma   30 1112 217  521  62 191 143 174  229  84  79  81  24  49  639
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          118 3466 677 1473 170 466 422 531  767 360 225 230  70 189 1946

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Oklahoma   13.8  43.3  42.9  66.7  2.7  1.0  0.8  0.3  0.7   4.7
93-94 Oklahoma   30.4  49.8  38.5  75.5  7.4  1.8  1.9  0.6  2.0  16.2
94-95 Oklahoma   36.5  48.6  39.2  82.3  8.4  2.2  2.4  0.7  2.2  23.6
95-96 Oklahoma   37.1  41.7  32.5  82.2  7.6  2.6  2.7  0.8  1.6  21.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           29.4  46.0  36.5  79.5  6.5  1.9  1.9  0.6  1.6  16.5

Predicted draft spot: 9-15 (camps could help or hurt).

Here's the deal:

Minor was a role player on Billy Tubbs' teams for his first two years. 
Then Kelvin Sampson came in and saw his potential and more or less 
designed the team around him in his junior year. Minor flourished, 
as he was in the top so many in the Big 8 for scoring, rebounding, FT 
shooting (and maybe 3pters and steals). He earned Big 8 POY, beating out 
Big Country. His senior year was a bit of a letdown. He still averaged 
about 20ppg and probably 8 rpg (I don't have the stats), but his shooting 
was way off, dropping down to about 43% (lower from outside). 

He came into the year with a lot of expectations, from the media, the
fans, and you could tell when he played, himself. He started the year off
in a shooting slump, scoring points, but taking too many shots and not
winning big games. People react differently to slumps, but it looked like
he got frustrated, sometimes blaming officials and being visibly angry
with himself or his teammates. He was supposed to be The Man and something 
wasn't working. 

But after about 6 games into the Big 8 season (I think they opened up 
1-5), he started playing like the 1st team/POY he was supposed to be as 
opposed to the 2nd team/Honorable mention level he had earlier in the 
year. It looked like Minor was back in force as his team rallied to a 
third place finish in the Big 8 (9-7 I believe) and on to the NCAA 
tournament. His game had returned and he played a little more relaxed. I 
am not sure which came first, his game or not being frustrated, but 
whatever it was, it worked. Based on the last half of the Big 8 season, he 
put himself back into contention for Big 8 POY, losing to Jacque Vaughn. 
Actually, it was three treys towards the end of the home game against 
Kansas that put him in serious contention. Anyway, he was 1st team all Big 
8 and made a few All America 3rd teams. 

His game:

Shooting - has NBA 3pt range (maybe not the old line, but definitely this 
one). He is never afraid to take a shot, and takes some bad ones (but not 
nearly as bad as half the ACC/Big East guards who can be five feet out of 
the arc, see a pro scout, TV camera, cute girl, etc. and think "now is the 
perfect time to throw up a brick"). And he's not a one dimensional shooter 
either. He can hit a five-foot jumper, a 10, 15, or 20 foot jumper (some 
players can shoot threes, but not twos). As I've said, he was in a slump, 
but it seemed to end as the year progressed. And he shoots around 80%+ 
from the foul line. And when he gets the ball, he can release as quickly 
as John Starks.

Moves - no one really calls him a "slasher", but perhaps they should take 
another look. He isn't the type to take the ball from the three point line 
and drive to the hoop, but when he has a man isolated about 12 feet out, 
he will  take him off the dribble, do a variety of spin moves and get some 
sort of scooping layup. Some think he's just a shooter, but his game is 
complete for his position. He does what SF's are supposed to do: be able 
to shoot, play inside a bit, and create his shots. To be quite honest, if 
he didn't have the long range, he could still be called a "scorer" based 
on his ability to get to the basket and finish (not necessarily dunks, but 
get the ball in). I imagine he has somewhat of a post game, but he'd 
rather go to the basket than take a fadeaway. I don't see him posting up 
anyone bigger, but his range should allow his team to go big and create a 
mismatch to let him play inside a bit.

Ball handling/passing - He's not a point forward. You don't want him as a 
ball handler, but if the PG is trapped and passes to him in the back 
court, don't cringe. He isn't the type to take the ball from center circle 
to the hole, but if he gets the ball near the arc, he can shake and bake 
to open up a shot. If he gets the ball within 15 feet, he is more than 
capapble of putting it on the floor, weaving through traffic and scoring 
which is how he gets most of his points. He's kind of the opposite of 
Jordan in the sense that MJ's bread and butter is his jump shot (it always 
has been), but most of his press comes from his dunks and drives. Minor is 
more of an inside guy who has a reputation for being primarily a shooter. 
In the NBA, he might have to alter his game a big and revert to more of a 
shooter, because he can always shoot. But he can take a man off the 
dribble as well as the next guy. His passing skills are fine. Nothing 
fancy, he may try to force something, but he will not likely have to run 
an offense, so most of his passing will be out of a double team to an open 
teammate, rather than having to find the open guy.

Defense - he can play defense. Were not talking Grant Hill or Stacey 
Augmon, but he's not Bob Sura. He has averaged over 8 rebounds per game 
from the SF spot for two years. His team never had a great center or PF, 
but the Big 8 has had a lot of trees over the past two years and he's benn 
able to get his rebounds. He wouldn't be a designated stopper, but he's 
not a liability.

Strengh/athleticism - His strength ismore than adequate for his position. 
He's a great athlete, quick, mobile, agile. He can jump and dunk just fine 
although he's not Pippen or Hill. But if he goes up for a dunk more than 
five feet away, don't worry. Unlike some players, he'll have no trouble 
slamming it home.

Quickness - faster than you think. People look at his skin and compare him 
to Bird since that is the only white forward who can shoot that they can 
think of. But truthfully, he's much quicker than Bird ever was. As with 
his defense, he's no Grant Hill, but he's not Danny Ferry. 

Intangibles - His junior year, he was a leader. His senior year, he tried
to do too much and got frustrated. I don't see him being drafted and put
into a position where he must lead the team, so he might have to revert to
more of a role player. I think he can do that just fine as long as he's
given a chance. Since Chuck Daly is no longer in the league and Dallas
will likely be firing Motta, I don't know if there is a coach left who has
an anti-rookie disposition, so if he's good enough, he should play. He is
cocky enough to earn respect from his teammates. Notice how I said cocky,
not arrogant. Just remember the ESPN footage of Rasheed Wallace standing 
on the sidelines wearing a suit with a piece of paper taped to his back 
saying, "Kick me, I'm a rookie" if you want to see the effects of 
cockiness vs. arrogance.

Comparisons - NOT BIRD!. There, I've said it. Ryan Minor is not Larry 
Bird. Both are white, both can shoot. One can throw no look passes, the 
other can run a 100 yard dash in reasonable time. Other than shooting, 
their games are completely different. I've thought all year about who to 
compare him to and had tough time. Like everyone, I tried to find a white 
guy to compare him to. No luck. There wasn't one. He's faster than nearly 
every white guy in the league. Barry is a better ball handler and a better 
leaper and passer (with half the inside game). And other than Chris Mullin 
(the one white guy you can compare to Bird), there aren't that many white 
SFs. And of the black SFs, they are either slashers (Pippen, Hill) or tall 
guys (Clifford Robinson, Schrempf), muscle boys (Mase), or scrappers 
(Derrick McKey). I think Sean Elliot is the best comparison. Solid overall 
game with an outside shot (Elliot is better) and not afraid to take it 
inside (Minor is more of a banger) with some decent moves. Too much of an 
athlete to be called a "shooter", but not enough of a slasher to be called 
that. The one thing that I've tried to stress is that calling Minor a 
shooter and ignoring his inside game would be like calling the 1996 
Drexler a shooting guard and forgetting about his rebounding, post game, 
and passing that makes Clyde more of a SF (who can lead a break, slash and 
drive and shoot the three and just about everything else).

Predictions - He is definately a first rounder. Had he played this year 
like he did his junior, he would have been a lottery. Now it is tough to 
say. I doubt he'll go top 8, but he won't slip past 17. He could start, 
depending on who drafts him. I'd give him about a 30% chance of starting, 
with about a 70% chance of getting at least 15 mpg. My gut feeling is that 
he will be this year's Michael Finley, someone who was hyped his junior 
year and during the preseason of his senior, then had a letdown and got 
drafted late and got his touch back in the pros and had teams like New 
Jersey and Cleveland kicking themselves.

General Info:
             Minor led the Big Eight Conference in scoring the
             past two seasons. He's also a baseball prospect.
Comments:
             Minor combines being a good scorer, with being a
             good shooter. Minor's shooting percentage did
             drop his senior season.
Summary:
             Minor may have hurt his stock with a poor showing
             at the Nike Desert Classic, but he still should be
             a top 20 pick.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Georgetown 15  162  15   31   0   0  13  29   30  13   7  16   2   4   43
92-93 Georgetown 11   70   9   21   0   1  13  21   19   5   0  10   2   1   31
93-94 SC State                    Did Not Play - Transfer Student
94-95 SC State   28 1001 191  386  15  56 102 148  261  69  66  78  36  32  499
95-96 SC State   30  ... 181  397  22 100 116 176  256 ...  83 ...  66  48  500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           84 1233 396  835  37 157 244 374  566  87 156 104 106  85 1073

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Georgetown 10.8  48.4   0.0  44.8  2.0  0.5  1.1  0.1  0.3   2.9
92-93 Georgetown  6.4  42.9   0.0  61.9  1.7  0.0  0.9  0.2  0.1   2.8
93-94 SC State              Did Not Play - Transfer Student
94-95 SC State   35.8  49.5  26.8  68.9  9.3  2.4  2.8  1.3  1.1  17.8
95-96 SC State    0.0  45.6  22.0  65.9  8.5  2.8  0.0  2.2  1.6  16.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           14.7  47.4  23.6  65.2  6.7  1.9  1.2  1.3  1.0  12.8

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Georgetown 15  162  15   31   0   0  13  29   30  13   7  16   2   4   43
92-93 Georgetown 11   70   9   21   0   1  13  21   19   5   0  10   2   1   31
93-94 SC State                    Did Not Play - Transfer Student
94-95 SC State   28 1001 191  386  15  56 102 148  261  69  66  78  36  32  499
95-96 SC State   30  ... 181  397  22 100 116 176  256 ...  83 ...  66  48  500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           84 1233 396  835  37 157 244 374  566  87 156 104 106  85 1073

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Georgetown 10.8  48.4   0.0  44.8  2.0  0.5  1.1  0.1  0.3   2.9
92-93 Georgetown  6.4  42.9   0.0  61.9  1.7  0.0  0.9  0.2  0.1   2.8
93-94 SC State              Did Not Play - Transfer Student
94-95 SC State   35.8  49.5  26.8  68.9  9.3  2.4  2.8  1.3  1.1  17.8
95-96 SC State    0.0  45.6  22.0  65.9  8.5  2.8  0.0  2.2  1.6  16.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           14.7  47.4  23.6  65.2  6.7  1.9  1.2  1.3  1.0  12.8

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
94-95 UW         26  711 155  362  24  99  44  73  216  92  27  68  18  26  378
95-96 UW         28  809 179  389  32 102  73 112  171  84  31  84  22  39  463
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           54 1520 334  751  56 201 117 185  387 176  58 152  40  65  841

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
94-95 UW         27.3  42.8  24.2  60.3  8.3  1.0  2.6  0.7  1.0  14.5
95-96 UW         28.9  46.0  31.4  65.2  6.1  1.1  3.0  0.8  1.4  16.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           28.1  44.5  27.9  63.2  7.2  1.1  2.8  0.7  1.2  15.6

General Info:
             One of the top scorers in the Pacific 10 Conference.
Comments:
             Needs to increase shooting range.
Summary:
             Sanford would be good investment for a team
             selecting in the second round, since he'll 
             probably return to college for more seasoning.

Strengths: Smooth athletic player who can step out and shoot the jumper.
Has the ability to play SF and can at times be a decent defender for a
young player.

Weaknesses: May be the worst of all the college kids coming out early in
terms of deciding to come out this year, not ready. Has to get stronger
and develop his game, much of his stats come from playing out of control
outside the framework of the team. As the season wore on and UW became a
better team, he seemed to be struggling with the team concept. Overly
exciteable kid, loses track of the game.

Comments: Lose the Nike swoosh in your hair and go back to college Mark.
Has a chance but is behind the curve with these other kids, played against
inferior competition in highschool in San Diego and is still catching up.
Needs to grow up as a player.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Mont JC                     Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Mont JC                     Statistics Unavailable
94-95 Georgetown 31  940 126  252   2  11  83 132  310  54  45  83  11  38  337
95-96 Georgetown 37 1016 147  250   1   7  85 133  324  67  51  72  16  70  380
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     68 1956 273  502   3  18 168 265  634 121  96 155  27 108  717

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Mont JC               Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Mont JC               Statistics Unavailable
94-95 Georgetown 30.3  50.0  18.2  62.9 10.0  1.5  2.7  0.4  1.2  10.9
95-96 Georgetown 27.5  58.8  14.3  63.9  8.8  1.4  1.9  0.4  1.9  10.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     28.8  54.4  16.7  63.4  9.3  1.4  2.3  0.4  1.6  10.5

A JuCo standout who came to transferred to Georgetown two years ago,
Jerome Williams is hands-down, the best rebounder in the draft... bar
none. At 6'9" the man has a vertical leap which borders on illegal, and
has an uncanny ability for the ball, especially on the offensive glass. 

First weaknesses. He doesn't have much of a shot to speak of beyond the
layup and short range jumper. Not much of a post player, his points came
mainly off garbage from the boards, and fast breaks. 

On the upside however, besides his tremendous rebounding skills is also
his excellent ball-handliing ability for a big man. He often started and
finished the fast break on a breakneck speed Hoyas team last year, and
also had the nack for the steal per game kind of role. His defense is
decent, though maybe a little suspect. Will be fine on defense and
coming up the court, but must work EXTREMELY HARD on his shooting if he
is to survive as more than a role player in the NBA.

Williams was named the MVP of the Nike Desert Classic averaging 13.7
points and 8 rebounds a game.  He still did not totally convice
scouts that he is an NBA small forward however he did help himself
tremendously.

An excellent (at times Rodman-like) rebounder with tremendous timing 
and great leaping ability, he also has the ball handling skill to 
play in the backcourt.  Had 11 double-doubles his senior season, 
bringing his career total to 24.  Weakness - outside shot and oddly 
enough, inside layups (remember the Big East conference tournament 
final?).

Junior College 

Was the Junior College MVP for the state of Maryland, averaging 26 
points, and 17 rebounds as a senior.

a player who is a great rebounder and a great ballhander.  Can take
the rebound and move past traffic for instant fast breaks.  Didn't
take more than probably 10 15ft+ jumpshots in his 2 year career at
G'town, so he probably won't be able to play SF in the pros.  He is a
bit undersized for a PF but he had the reputation as being the
toughest and most physical player in the big east two years ago.
Absolutely no post moves.  Gets his points off of offensive boards and
transition.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Syracuse   22  176  19   60   9  37  13  18   29  32   8  12   1   7   60
92-93 Syracuse   26  316  43   99  17  38  23  29   72  33  17  26   7  20  126
93-94 Penn St                     Did Not Play - Transfer Student
94-95 Penn St    32  794 147  317  26  84  91 107  202  80  51  68   9  28  411
95-96 Penn St    28  835 121  306  43 108  81 102  165  66  56  69   8  15  366
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          108 2121 330  782  95 267 208 256  468 211 132 175  25  70  963

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Syracuse    8.0  31.7  24.3  72.2  1.3  0.4  0.5  0.0  0.3   2.7
92-93 Syracuse   12.2  43.4  44.7  79.3  2.8  0.7  1.0  0.3  0.8   4.8
93-94 Penn St               Did Not Play - Transfer Student
94-95 Penn St    24.8  46.4  31.0  85.0  6.3  1.6  2.1  0.3  0.9  12.8
95-96 Penn St    29.8  39.5  39.8  79.4  5.9  2.0  2.5  0.3  0.5  13.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           19.6  42.2  35.6  81.3  4.3  1.2  1.6  0.2  0.6   8.9

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
90-91 BYU        34  897  78  158   4  10  50  76  151  64  96  54  14  20  210
91-92 BYU                         Did Not Play - Mormon Mission
92-93 BYU                         Did Not Play - Mormon Mission
93-94 BYU        32  993 142  246   1   2 124 156  192  92  61  49  21  25  409
94-95 BYU        32 1037 171  307   2   3 150 179  212  96  47  60  12  30  494
95-96 BYU        28  982 170  316  12  27 187 230  198  81  68  63  26  29  539
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          126 3909 561 1027  19  42 511 641  753 333 272 226  73 104 1652

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
90-91 BYU        26.4  49.4  40.0  65.8  4.4  2.8  1.6  0.4  0.6   6.2
91-92 BYU                   Did Not Play - Mormon Mission
92-93 BYU                   Did Not Play - Mormon Mission
93-94 BYU        31.0  57.7  50.0  79.5  6.0  1.9  1.5  0.7  0.8  12.8
94-95 BYU        32.4  55.7  66.7  83.8  6.6  1.5  1.9  0.4  0.9  15.4
95-96 BYU        35.1  53.8  44.4  81.3  7.1  2.4  2.3  0.9  1.0  19.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           31.0  54.6  45.2  79.7  6.0  2.2  1.8  0.6  0.8  13.1

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Arizona    17  127  18   39   1   8   8  10   34   7  13  10   7   6   45
93-94 Arizona    30  287  43   88  14  33  13  21   79  21  15  25   8  10  113
94-95 Arizona    29  597  75  159  31  84  15  31  120  54  38  31   8  22  196
95-96 Arizona    33  857 157  307  35  90  33  56  154  66  23  41  13  38  382
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          109 1868 293  593  81 215  69 118  387 148  89 107  36  76  736

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Arizona     7.5  46.2  12.5  80.0  2.0  0.8  0.6  0.4  0.4   2.6
93-94 Arizona     9.6  48.9  42.4  61.9  2.6  0.5  0.8  0.3  0.3   3.8
94-95 Arizona    20.6  47.2  36.9  48.4  4.1  1.3  1.1  0.3  0.8   6.8
95-96 Arizona    26.0  51.1  38.9  58.9  4.7  0.7  1.2  0.4  1.2  11.6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           17.1  49.4  37.7  58.5  3.6  0.8  1.0  0.3  0.7   6.8

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 S Idaho   ...  ... ...  ... ... ... ... ...  ... ... ... ... ... ...  ...
93-94 UNLV        6  149  27   70   6  27  10  11   30  15   7   8   1   6   70
94-95 UNLV       28  913 128  281  41 121  72 102  116  79  65  64   3  28  369
95-96 UNLV       26  793 143  397  57 160  90 146  123  73  45  60   8  27  433
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           60 1855 298  748 104 308 172 259  269 167 117 132  12  61  872

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 S Idaho     ...   ...   ...   ... 11.2  ...  ...  ...  ...  21.3
93-94 UNLV       24.8  38.6  22.2  90.9  5.0  1.2  1.3  0.2  1.0  11.7
94-95 UNLV       32.6  45.6  33.9  70.6  4.1  2.3  2.3  0.1  1.0  13.2
95-96 UNLV       30.5  36.0  35.6  61.6  4.7  1.7  2.3  0.3  1.0  16.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           30.9  39.8  33.8  66.4  4.5  2.0  2.2  0.2  1.0  14.5

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Kentucky                    Did Not Play - Ineligible
93-94 Kentucky   34  484  72  153  19  50  31  56  131  60  39  49  19  20  194
94-95 Kentucky   33  744 128  251  28  77  61  84  185  96  50  53  38  27  345
95-96 Kentucky   36  889 152  280  28  60  75 104  206 117  92  81  51  44  407
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          103 2117 352  684  75 187 167 244  522 273 181 183 108  91  946

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Kentucky              Did Not Play - Ineligible
93-94 Kentucky   14.2  47.1  38.0  55.4  3.9  1.1  1.4  0.6  0.6   5.7
94-95 Kentucky   22.5  51.0  36.4  72.6  5.6  1.5  1.6  1.2  0.8  10.5
95-96 Kentucky   24.7  54.3  46.7  72.1  5.7  2.6  2.3  1.4  1.2  11.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           20.6  51.5  40.1  68.4  5.1  1.8  1.8  1.0  0.9   9.2

        A tall, lanky player with superior quickness and deep range on his
jumper. On a team filled with stars at Kentucky, McCarty's contribution was
oftern overlooked. He came to Kentucky as a talented prep star but was
forced to sit out his freshman season because he was academically
ineligible. McCarthy is an excellent athlete and a terrific defender who
effectively guarded Marcus Camby in UK's matchup with UMass in the Final
Four. McCarthy's size and quickness was the catalyst that made Kentucky's
full-court press so lethal. McCarthy also showed that he can hit consistenly
from behind the three-point line and run the court and finish effectively.
Both aspects of his game will suit him well in the NBA.

        McCarthy's passing and ball-handling are questionable. Since he was
never featured in Kentucky's offense, he never proved he had the skills to
create shots for his teammates. McCarthy's lithe frame (he's listed at
230lbs but is probably around 215lbs) means that he will have to hit the
weights. Also, McCarthy has yet to show that he can create his own offense
or score with his back to the basket.

        McCarthy may project out to be a Robert Horry type player in the NBA.

        While he wasn't quite Jamal Mashburn junior, Walter McCarty ended up
        carving out a pretty nice career at Kentucky.  After sitting out his
        freshman year due to Prop 48 and playing a supportive role his
        sophomore year, McCarty started showing his junior and senior years
        the talent many scouts drooled over when he left HS in Indiana.
        McCarty is a tremendous athlete, with explosive leaping ability.
        Many times Kentucky fans were pulled out of their seats (something
        which doesn't happen unless something spectacular happens, for the
        most part) when McCarty would fly in after a missed shot to jam it
        home.  In a game versus Alabama, McCarty once drove down the lane
        and threw down a reverse dunk over the likes of Antonio McDyess and
        Jason Caffey (who later were 1st round NBA picks).  Combine that
        with a nice all-around game, and you have a pretty nice package of
        a player.

        Offensively, McCarty has a myriad of skills.  What probably stands
        out the most is his ability to shoot from the outside.  At 6'10",
        it almost seems unfair how well McCarty can stroke the college 3-pt
        field goal.  McCarty is a very good standstill outside shooter and
        will simply bury the open 3 if you leave him open.  His favorite
        shots seem to be right at the top of the key, and from the sides
        (where he hit the shot that put Kentucky up for good in their big
        comeback in the LSU game 3 years back).  This range probably could
        extend out to the NBA 3-pt line.  Inside, McCarty has a decent game,
        with a fair array of moves and a soft jump hook.  However, McCarty
        does seem a bit tentative in shooting the ball at times, and
        never really seemed to be all that assertive in his offensive game.
        His game off the dribble could use some work and he will likely need
        to have shots created for him.

        McCarty is a decent ball handler (especially for his size) and
        is a tremendous interior passer, and will find the open
        man.  Defensively, he is a pretty good shot-blocker, mostly due to
        his long arms and leaping ability.  He also is pretty quick on his
        defender, getting a fair share of steals.  Before Walker took over
        the spot this season, McCarty used to be the point man on UK's press,
        where he'd guard the man taking the ball out of bounds.  There's one
        thing however, McCarty could definitely use some weight and muscle on
        his frame.  For years Pitino has been trying to get McCarty to put
        some meat on his bones -- in fact at one time, he even threatened to
        keep him out of the starting lineup until he reached a particular
        weight.  The biggest problem for him with this will probably be on
        defense, although his athletic skills may make up for it somewhat.
        It will also affect him on his rebounding as he'll easily get pushed
        out of the paint on rebounds.  With this in mind, he often fouls as
        a result, so he does have some problems with foul trouble.  With all
        these factors, McCarty likely projects to be a SF on the next level.
        In fact, good comparisons could probably be drawn between him and
        Robert Horry, who has many of the same type of skills.

        There are mixed opinions regarding Walter McCarty.  Some feel that
        he is a budding superstar waiting to happen, and was wasn't given
        the minutes or time to really shine under Rick Pitino's system.
        Others feel that the Pitino system actually hid some of McCarty's
        weaknesses.  Nevertheless, most all seem to feel that he is a
        1st round draft choice.  McCarty could very well be a low lottery
        pick (much like Horry was).  While he is not going to be a top notch
        superstar, he can be a 2nd-tier type of player that Horry is.  He comes
        from a winner, which certainly can't hurt.  To boot, he's a great
        singer, so he could certainly help out with the national anthem once
        in a while.

General Info:
             Played center for Kentucky's National
             Championship team.
Comments:
             One of the most atheletic players available in
             the draft. A versatile player, who could be a
             Robert Horry-type small forward.
Summary:
             Will likely be a lottery pick.  

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Texas Tech 30  729 118  272  17  54  66 105  154  77  48  61   3  32  319
93-94 Texas Tech 28 1032 205  425  17  70 149 210  264  74  81  85   4  45  576
94-95 Texas Tech 30 1024 211  414  11  42 169 213  235  67  88  81   2  45  602
95-96 Texas Tech 31 1071 202  441  31 101 170 234  242  64  90  87   2  22  605
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          119 3856 736 1552  76 267 554 762  895 282 307 314  11 144 2102

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Texas Tech 24.3  43.4  31.5  62.9  5.1  1.6  2.0  0.1  1.1  10.6
93-94 Texas Tech 36.9  48.2  24.3  71.0  9.4  2.9  3.0  0.1  1.6  20.6
94-95 Texas Tech 34.1  51.0  26.2  79.3  7.8  2.9  2.7  0.1  1.5  20.1
95-96 Texas Tech 34.5  45.8  30.7  72.6  7.8  2.9  2.8  0.1  0.7  19.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           32.4  47.4  28.5  72.7  7.5  2.6  2.6  0.1  1.2  17.7

General Info:
             Sasser was a third team All-American. 
Comments:
             Sasser's not only a complete player(versatile on
             offense, good defender), but he's a team leader as
             well.
Summary:
             Sasser performed well at the Nike Desert Classic,
             and he's a likely first round selection.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Indiana                     Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Indiana    35  615  62  146  23  65  37  54  138  50  46  27   5  18  184
93-94 Indiana    27  791 116  259  43  94  46  58  183  56  59  52  13  37  321
94-95 Indiana    31 1051 177  383  58 139 126 161  208  77 101  72  17  25  538
95-96 Indiana    31 1156 212  474  62 158 172 203  221  56 126  72  19  43  658
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          124 3613 567 1262 186 456 381 476  750 239 332 223  54 123 1701

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Indiana               Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Indiana    17.6  42.5  35.4  68.5  3.9  1.3  0.8  0.1  0.5   5.3
93-94 Indiana    29.3  44.8  45.7  79.3  6.8  2.2  1.9  0.5  1.4  11.9
94-95 Indiana    33.9  46.2  41.7  78.3  6.7  3.3  2.3  0.5  0.8  17.4
95-96 Indiana    37.3  44.7  39.2  84.7  7.1  4.1  2.3  0.6  1.4  21.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           29.1  44.9  40.8  80.0  6.0  2.7  1.8  0.4  1.0  13.7

Matt Bullard revisited. a big J shooter, with  quick release and good 
shooting range, but not a player who creates his own shots: hes not a 
driver or a post player, and quick defender can really bother him.
A tweener defensivelly: has no chance guarding small forwards on the 
perimeter, and lacks physical strength to defend post players... not a 
good rebounder... doesnt block shots...
A smart player, with sound fundamentalls (he did, after all, played for 
bobby knight), can found a nitch as a role player, who can help spread 
the defense for the team's big men or penetratiors...

General Info:
             Leading scorer in the Big 10 this season. Selected
             third team All-American.
Comments:
             Good offensive player. Not only is he a good shooter,
             but he's very good at faking out defenders.
Summary:
             Evans has good size for a SF. There are concerns about
             his footspeed, quickness, and previous injuries.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Georgia    29  554  99  201   9  26  64 105  103  59  44  65   7  52  271
93-94 Georgia    30  859 157  324   6  34  93 141  168  87 114 109  10  59  413
94-95 Georgia    29  861 153  330  18  58  56  97  151  75  83  87   7  46  380
95-96 Georgia    31  878 176  327  16  52  94 143  171  73  83  78  15  56  462
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          119 3152 585 1182  49 170 307 486  593 294 324 339  39 213 1526

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Georgia    19.1  49.3  34.6  61.0  3.6  1.5  2.2  0.2  1.8   9.3
93-94 Georgia    28.6  48.5  17.6  66.0  5.6  3.8  3.6  0.3  2.0  13.8
94-95 Georgia    29.7  46.4  31.0  57.7  5.2  2.9  3.0  0.2  1.6  13.1
95-96 Georgia    28.3  53.8  30.8  65.7  5.5  2.7  2.5  0.5  1.8  14.9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           26.5  49.5  28.8  63.2  5.0  2.7  2.8  0.3  1.8  12.8

General Info:
             Brother of Willie Anderson.
Comments:
             Had some good games in the post-season. He's best-
             suited in the open court slashing to the basket.
Summary:
             An indication of the depth of this draft is that
             Anderson should be available mid-late second round.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Villanova  23  169  18   55   4  23   5   7   27  23  15  11   0   1   45
93-94 Villanova  32  917 144  320  62 158  52  69  136  79  45  64  10  27  402
94-95 Villanova  33 1066 189  397  94 214  47  64  144  78  52  59  14  32  519
95-96 Villanova  32  995 144  343  65 190  78  92  121  56  48  46   5  22  431
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          120 3147 495 1115 225 585 182 232  428 236 160 180  29  82 1397

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Villanova   7.3  32.7  17.4  71.4  1.2  0.7  0.5  0.0  0.0   2.0
93-94 Villanova  28.7  45.0  39.2  75.4  4.3  1.4  2.0  0.3  0.8  12.6
94-95 Villanova  32.3  47.6  43.9  73.4  4.4  1.6  1.8  0.4  1.0  15.7
95-96 Villanova  31.1  42.0  34.2  84.8  3.8  1.5  1.4  0.2  0.7  13.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           26.2  44.4  38.5  78.4  3.6  1.3  1.5  0.2  0.7  11.6

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 UMass      31  586  50  116   3  13  50  83  116  54  33  34   2  16  153
93-94 UMass      35 1025 102  216   5   9  70 127  216  78  56  50   1  30  279
94-95 UMass      34  875  90  179   4  15  53  97  186  52  50  34   5  28  237
95-96 UMass      37 1204 134  288   2   6 104 171  273  71  55  68   0  36  374
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          137 3690 376  799  14  43 277 478  791 255 194 186   8 110 1043

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 UMass      18.9  43.1  23.1  60.2  3.7  1.1  1.1  0.1  0.5   4.9
93-94 UMass      29.3  47.2  55.6  55.1  6.2  1.6  1.4  0.0  0.9   8.0
94-95 UMass      25.7  50.3  26.7  54.6  5.5  1.5  1.0  0.1  0.8   7.0
95-96 UMass      32.5  46.5  33.3  60.8  7.4  1.5  1.8  0.0  1.0  10.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           26.9  47.1  32.6  57.9  5.8  1.4  1.4  0.1  0.8   7.6

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Marquette  28  757 108  237  29  68  62  78 117  42  48  52   6  20  307
93-94 Marquette  33 1081 126  302  39  96  48  70 206  73  75  80  11  37  339
94-95 Marquette  33 1024 154  367  49 132  79 119 213  53  54  47  31  26  436
95-96 Marquette  31 1018 146  346  33  94  64  85 160  46  56  54  13  24  389
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          125 3880 534 1252 150 390 253 352 696 214 233 233  61 107 1471

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Marquette  27.0  45.6  42.6  79.5  4.2  1.7  1.9  0.2  0.7  11.0
93-94 Marquette  32.8  41.7  40.6  68.6  6.2  2.3  2.4  0.3  1.1  10.3
94-95 Marquette  31.0  42.0  37.1  66.4  6.5  1.6  1.4  0.9  0.8  13.2
95-96 Marquette  32.8  42.2  35.1  75.3  5.2  1.8  1.7  0.4  0.8  12.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           31.0  42.7  38.5  71.9  5.6  1.9  1.9  0.5  0.9  11.8

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
93-94 Iowa       27  736 156  272  16  42  86 109  203  80  61  86   3  40  414
94-95 Iowa       26  634 138  294  32  91  97 121  162  73  53  86   4  31  405
95-96 Iowa       32  895 179  375  40 115  86 116  239  96  99  96   8  48  484
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           85 2265 473  941  88 248 269 346  604 249 213 268  15 119 1303

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
93-94 Iowa       27.3  57.4  38.1  78.9  7.5  2.3  3.2  0.1  1.5  15.3
94-95 Iowa       24.4  46.9  35.2  80.2  6.2  2.0  3.3  0.2  1.2  15.6
95-96 Iowa       28.0  47.7  34.8  74.1  7.5  3.1  3.0  0.3  1.5  15.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           26.6  50.3  35.5  77.7  7.1  2.5  3.2  0.2  1.4  15.3

General Info:
             Settles surprised a lot of people when he declared
             for the draft.
Comments:
             Settles will have to make the adjustment to SF in the
             pros. Like Evans, there are concerns about his foot-
             speed, quickness, and previous injuries.
Summary:
             He'll probably be selected in the second round.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Phoenix     7  ... ...  ... ... ... ... ...  ... ... ... ... ... ...  ...
93-94 Phoenix    30  ... 220  423   0   3 102 162  157  71 106  91  18  51  542
94-95 Hawaii     25  668  92  177   0   0  51  86  124  55  40  56   5  32  235
95-96 Hawaii     24  855 150  252   0   1 117 154  155  68  60  62   7  32  417
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     49 1523 242  429   0   1 168 240  279 123 100 118  12  64  652

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Phoenix     ...   ...   ...   ...  ...  ...  ...  ...  ...   ...
93-94 Phoenix     ...  52.0   0.0  63.0  5.2  3.5  3.0  0.6  1.7  18.1
94-95 Hawaii     26.7  52.0   0.0  59.3  5.0  1.6  2.2  0.2  1.3   9.4
95-96 Hawaii     35.6  59.5   0.0  76.0  6.5  2.5  2.6  0.3  1.3  17.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     31.1  56.4   0.0  70.0  5.7  2.0  2.4  0.2  1.3  13.3

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
93-94 Louisville 31  992 108  280  38 112  37  64  182  75 132  82  27  44  291
94-95 Louisville 33 1060 149  343  37 123  49  73  184  86 101  92  33  72  384
95-96 Louisville                  Did Not Play - Ineligible
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           64 2052 257  623  75 235  86 137  366 161 233 174  60 116  675

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
93-94 Louisville 32.0  38.6  33.9  57.8  5.9  4.3  2.6  0.9  1.4   9.4
94-95 Louisville 32.1  43.4  30.1  67.1  5.6  3.1  2.8  1.0  2.2  11.6
95-96 Louisville            Did Not Play - Ineligible
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           32.1  41.3  31.9  62.8  5.7  3.6  2.7  0.9  1.8  10.5