[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Global movement of toxins (arctic, etc.)



For your info - P. Dines

--- FORWARD ---
From: Pete Roche, INTERNET:Pete.Roche@uk.greenpeace.org
To: Patricia Dines, 73652,1202
Date: Thu, Jan 2, 1997, 8:04 AM
Subject: Industry Poisons Arctic.

     An interesting article from a UK Sunday paper just before Xmas.
     
     "World Industry poisons Arctic purity" Independent on Sunday 15th 
     December 1996
     A Climatic Trick Dumps Chemicals from afar on people and animals in 
     the far north, writes Geoffrey Lean.
     
     Their language may have 30 different words for "snow" but it doesn't 
     have one for "contamination". So it is hard to explain to the Inuit 
     people of the remote and pristine Broughton Island in the Canadian 
     Arctic that - thanks to a strange and newly discovered trick of 
     natural systems - they are more polluted by some of the world's most 
     toxic chemicals than any other people on earth.
     
     And yet research shows that the bodies of the 450 people of the small 
     island, thousands of miles awy from the source of the pollution have 
     the highest levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) ever found, 
     except in victims of industrial accidents. The chemicals are 
     increasingly suspected of causing cancer, suppressing fertility and 
     damaging the immune system.
     
     Neighbouring peoples, on the vast Baffin Island next door, shun them 
     as "PCB people" and try to dissuade their children from marrying them.

     But the neighbours are highly contaminated too: Inuit from Greenland 
     on one side of Baffin and Broughton Islands to Arctic Quebec on the 
     other, have seven times as much of the chemicals in their bodies as 
     people living in temperate and industrialised parts of Canada.
     
     PCBs were long ago banned in most industrial countries after being 
     used in a host of applications from paints to pesticides, plastics to 
     electrical equipment - but they are still concentrating in the Artic. 
     Curiously, they are doing so as the direct result of their continued 
     use in developing countries in the tropics.
     
     It is a similar story for a host of similarly dangerous chemicals. 
     Measurements quoted by the authoritative technical magazine, 
     Environmental Data Services, show that Greenlanders have more than 70 
     times as much of the pesticide hexachlorobenzene (HCB) in their bodies

     than temperate Canadians. Another pesticide HCH is over 100 times more

     concentrated in the waters of the Arctic Beaufort Sea than in the Java

     Sea, near where it is mainly used.
     
     Polar Bears, seals, fish and birds of prey are also heavily polluted, 
     and Arctic ecosystems are under threat. DR Frank Wania of the 
     Norweigan Institute of Air Research at Tromso, 200 miles north of the 
     Arctic Circle, says: "The circumpolar nations should be very 
     concerned". Dr Wania who first stumbled across the growing crisis at 
     the beginning of the decade when studying for his doctorate - and  
     other scientists believe that the cause is "global distillation", 
     which picks up pollutants from where they are released and dumps them,

     many thousands of miles away, on some of the most fragile ecosystem 
     and vulnerable peoples in the world. The alarming planetary phenomenon

     is turning the roof of the earth into its ultimate chemical dump.
     
     In the process, the world seems to act as a giant distillery, Volatile

     chemicals - such as PCBs, HCBs, dioxins and other pesticides such as 
     toxaphene and DDT - boil off into the air when they are used in the 
     tropics. The chemicals are then carried by the winds until they hit 
     cooler climates, where they condense and fall to earth.
     
     As in the fractionated distillation equipment used in school science 
     classes, different groups of chemicals condense at different 
     temperatures. DDT for example is less volatile than many others and, 
     seems to be deposited mainly in temperate regions. So is toxaphene: 
     high levels of the pesticide are found in North Sea fish, even though 
     it has rarely been used in Europe.
     
     HCB, HCH and some forms of PCBs - which are much more volatile - seem 
     to carry on all the way up to the Arctic: concentrations in seals, for

     example, increase the further north you go. An estimated 99.9% of the 
     HCH used on rice paddies in South India boil off  into the atmosphere 
     to condense out elsewhere. And research shows that concentrations of 
     HCBs are negligible in the tropics, where they are mainly used, except

     in the high African mountains, where the temperature drops enough for 
     condensation to occur.
     
     Dr Wania SAYS that the chemicals can take between a few weeks and 
     decades to find their way north. At one extreme a favourable wind can 
     carry them straight up from the tropics in just a fortnight. At the 
     other, they may move northwards in a series of small jumps that he 
     calls "the grasshopper effect" repeatedly condensing out and then 
     evaporating again for the next jump, as temperatures change with the 
     season. "Even pesticides sprayed in the 1950s may still be on their 
     way" he says.
     
     However long the journey, the Arctic is the end of the line. Less is 
     known about what is happening in the Antarctic, because far fewer 
     measurements have been done, but Dr Wania thinks there is less global 
     distillation there. The chamicals are mostly used in the northern 
     hemisphere, he says, and winds and the pollution they carry tend not 
     to cross the equator. There also seems to be less movement of air 
     towards the Pole in the southern hemisphere.
     
     The chemicals concentrate in the Arctic because it is a relatively 
     small area, attracting pollution from the whole hemisphere. Other 
     special features also increase the danger - the cold slows down the 
     natural decomposition of the chemicals, and Arctic wildlife relies on 
     thick layers of blubber and fat, in which pollution builds up. The 
     Inuit are at the top of the food chain eating a lot of local fish and 
     wildlife. So although they have contributed virtually nothing to the 
     pollution, and do not benefit at all from the use of the chamicals 
     thousands of miles to the south, they are becoming its principal 
     victims.
     
     Dr Wania believes that the use of these chemicals will have to be 
     banned worldwide, because of what is happening in the Arctic. The 
     United Nations Environment Programme is beginning work on a draft 
     international treaty which could achieve this, but the pollution of 
     many years is already in the planet's atmosphere, working its way 
     towards the poles.