[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BEN # 226



BBBBB    EEEEEE   NN   N             ISSN 1188-603X
BB   B   EE       NNN  N             
BBBBB    EEEEE    NN N N             BOTANICAL
BB   B   EE       NN  NN             ELECTRONIC
BBBBB    EEEEEE   NN   N             NEWS

No. 226                              July 1, 1999

aceska@victoria.tc.ca                Victoria, B.C.
-----------------------------------------------------------
 Dr. A. Ceska, P.O.Box 8546, Victoria, B.C. Canada V8W 3S2
-----------------------------------------------------------

            BEN # 226 and BEN # 277 are dedicated to

            DR. THOMAS CHRISTOPHER (CHRIS) BRAYSHAW,

     Curator Emeritus of the Royal British Columbia Museum,
              Victoria, British Columbia, Canada,
      on the occasion of his 80th birthday, July 2, 1999.


BOTANICAL HIGHLIGHTS OF A MARCH 1982 TRIP TO SOUTHERN CHILE
     WITH CHRIS BRAYSHAW AND DEKALB RUSSELL
From: Rudolf Schmid <schmid@socrates.berkeley.edu>

From  5-22  March  1982 Chris Brayshaw, Dekalb Russell, an apple
grower  and  fervent  naturalist  from  West  Virginia,  and   I
botanized  in  southern  Chile, concentrating on Myrtaceae, con-
ifers,  and  monogeneric  families  (the  #-marked   below)   or
monotypic,  often  endemic  genera  (the  *-marked  below). Some
sought-after plants such as Gomortega keule* (Gomortegaceae#) we
saw only in the splendid botanical garden at Valdivia. We camped
several times but otherwise spent nights  in  low-cost  shelters
(refugios) and especially inexpensive hotels and motels.

We  escaped Santiago the capitol as quickly as possible, heading
south on the Pan-American highway  to  Valdivia  835  km  south.
Other  than  remnant  espinal  (Acacia  caven woodland) there is
little to see along the highway until  around  Collipulli,  some
575  km  south  of  Santiago because the roadside vegetation has
been badly mangled.

The Lake Region south of Valdivia, especially  Lago  Llanquihue,
is very pretty, but the vegetation has been greatly disturbed by
farming,  particularly  dairying.  However, the flanks of Volcan
Osorno (2661 m) are nicely intact. Plants of interest here, many
especially from an alien  northern-hemisphere  perspective,  in-
cluded:  Coriaria  ruscifolia  (Coriariaceae#),  Embothrium coc-
cineum (Proteaceae), Empetrum  rubrum  (Empetraceae),  Eucryphia
cordifolia  (Eucryphiaceae#),  Euphrasia  trifida (Scrophularia-
ceae), Gevuina  avellana*  (Proteaceae),  Griselinia  ruscifolia
(Cornaceae),    Misodendrum    linearifolium   (Misodendraceae#)
parasitic on Nothofagus dombeyi (Fagaceae), Ugni molinae (Myrta-
ceae), the  cushion  Nassauvia  revoluta  (Compositae),  Gunnera
chilensis and G. magellanica (Gunneraceae#), Laurelia sp. (Moni-
miaceae),   Pernettya  myrtilloides  (Ericaceae),  Quinchamalium
ericoides  (Santalaceae),  Chloraea   piquichen   (Orchidaceae),
Cortaderia  sp. (Gramineae), and Philesia magellanica (Philesia-
ceae).

I found the allerce forest of Fitzroya cupressoides*  (Cupressa-
ceae)  east  of  Lenca, about 35 km southeast of Pto. Montt, the
most impressive part of the trip. We  got  permission  from  the
manager  of  a lumber mill to go onto their private logging road
(I forget why there was no logging activity, even though it  was
the  middle  of  the  week). We were offered a jeep but took our
cheap rental van, a Furgon Daihatsu, 6 km up the road  until  it
pooped  out,  camped  nearby, and the next morning walked up the
steep road to its end at about 800 m el. The flora here was very
rich and spectacular, particularly the Fitzroya trees, both  the
ones  still  standing and the ones slaughtered. One presumes the
trees on the steep slopes of the ravines still survive. At  this
site  there  were  many  pteridophytes (especially Asplenium and
Blechnum spp.), many Myrtaceae  such  as  Luma  apiculata,  Myr-
ceugenia  spp.,  Myrteola  nummularia,  which  is a delightfully
delicate prostrate shrub, Tepualia  stipularis,*  which  is  the
only  capsular  myrt  (subfamily Leptospermoideae) native to the
New World, as well as other interesting taxa such as Saxegothaea
conspicua* (Podocarpaceae),  Aextoxicon  punctatum*  (Aextoxica-
ceae#),  Asteranthera ovata* (Gesneriaceae), Azara serrata (Fla-
courtiaceae),    Campsidium     valdivianum*     (Bignoniaceae),
Crinodendron  hookerianum (Elaeocarpaceae), Desfontainia spinosa
(Desfontainiaceae#),  Griselinia  sp.   (Cornaceae),   Hydrangea
serratifolia (Hydrangeaceae), Mitraria coccinea* (Gesneriaceae),
Tristerix  (now  Macrosolen) tetrandrus (Loranthaceae, parasitic
on the Campsidium), and Chusquea (Gramineae). One  could  easily
spend several days in a botanically rich place such as this.

Returning  to Santiago and southeast of Collipulli we toured the
easily accessible and very spectacular Araucaria araucana forest
in Parque National Conguillio on the east flank of Volcan Llaima
(3060 m). During out visit, we did not see a  single  person  in
the   entire   park.   Here  also  was  Austrocedrus  chilensis*
(Cupressaceae) and Misodendrum  linearifolium  (Misodendraceae#)
parasitic on Nothofagus antarctica (Fagaceae).

The trip ended with a jaunt to the Farellones, a ski resort area
in  the  Andes  just  northeast  of  Santiago. This was also the
highest point (3000+ m) of the trip. The  lower  elevations  are
covered  with  mattoral, which is especially impressive with its
numerous taxa  of  columnar  cacti,  such  as  Trichocereus  sp.
parasitized  by  Tristerix  aphyllus  (Loranthaceae),  and  many
individuals of Kageneckia angustifolia  and  K.  oblonga  (Rosa-
ceae).  At  our  highest  elevation  around 3000 m prostrate and
cushion plants of Calycera sp. (Calyceraceae) and especially the
umbels Azorella spp. and Laretia acaulis*  were  striking.  Also
here  were  Ephedra chilensis (Ephedraceae#) and Oxalis geminata
(Oxalidaceae).

It was also fascinating to see taxa familiar to us from cultiva-
tion but growing wild in Chile, for instance:  Calceolaria  spp.
(Scrophulariaceae), Drimys winteri var. chilensis (Winteraceae),
Fuchsia     magellanica    (Onagraceae),    Alstroemeria    spp.
(Alstroemeriaceae), Lapageria rosea* (Philesiaceae), and so many
others. In contrast, we were less  enthralled  to  see  familiar
Californian taxa such as Eschscholzia californica (Papaveraceae)
and  especially  plantations  of  Pinus  radiata (Pinaceae). The
latter have contributed so much to  the  impoverishment  of  the
native  vegetation,  such  as  at the classic collecting site at
Corral, down the river from Valdivia.

We never made it to the Juan Fernandez Islands or to  Concepcion
area. Otherwise these would have figured in the above narrative.

To  Chris, the best of birthday wishes for your 80th (on 2 July)
from me and all of your plant friends mentioned above.


SNOWPATCH BUTTERCUPS OF THE WESTERN MOUNTAINS OF NORTH AMERICA
From: Fulton Fisher <ffisher@sfu.ca>

Near  treeline  in  the  mountains  of  western  North  America,
wherever  snowpatches  persist well into the summer, one or more
of a closely inter-related group of  species  of  Ranunculus  is
likely to be found (Fisher et al. 1972, Rowley et al. 1975). All
seem  to  require  an  assured supply of meltwater from adjacent
snowpatches. Most occur mainly in full  sunlight  although  one,
the  well  known  mountain  buttercup  R. eschscholtzii, usually
barely emerges from partial shade.  Although  both  natural  and
artificial  hybrids  connecting  the species are always sterile,
they do show a closely shared common ancestry. Their  chromosome
numbers  form  a  polyploid  series  from  2n=16 to 96, the high
number sets probably having evolved step by step by combinations
of lower number sets.  The  actual  phylogeny  should  today  be
easily determined by DNA analysis.

The  best known and most widely ranging of the snowpatch butter-
cups is R. eschscholtzii Schlecht. This  hexaploid  (2n=48)  was
first  found  near  its  northern  limit  on Unalaska Is. in the
Aleutians near sealevel but at the southernmost end of its range
in N.Mexico it reaches nearly 15000 ft, almost always  in  moist
shady  places  on  the  edge of the treeline or not far from it.
Measurements have shown that this species  requires  less  light
than the others but with running water alongside, it may venture
well into the open.

Although  Ranunculus  eschscholtzii  itself is often observed at
altitudes as low as 4000 ft in southern British  Columbia  (BC),
probably  only  one  of its six other relatives, the circumpolar
R. nivalis L.(2n=96), has been found regularly in BC and only in
the far north. The other five  diploid  and  tetraploid  species
have  almost mutually exclusive geographic ranges in the western
mountains of the US even though geographically they all  overlap
R. eschscholtzii; only R. suksdorfii and R. eximius in the south
east corner of BC, appear to cross the Canadian border.

There  are  two western diploids, R. oxynotus Gray of the Sierra
Nevada, and R. suksdorfii Gray. This last is well known  in  the
Olympics  and  Cascades  and as far south as the Siskiyou Mts of
northern California. But this  species  also  crosses  into  the
Bitterroot  Mts  of  Idaho  (and  has  been reported even in the
Flathead and Waterton Lakes region of Canada). Its range forms a
big loop back southwards and  again  westwards  into  the  drier
mountains  of Idaho and eastern Oregon, and reaches even eastern
Nevada. This is a giant horseshoe with differences  between  its
ends.

The  eastern  populations  of R. suksdorfii have formed at least
two new geographic races distinguishable as subspecies from  the
original  Cascades  version  first  collected  from  Mt  Hood by
Suksdorf. One of these  subspecies  was  originally  given  full
species  status  as  the  glaucous  R. trisectus  Eastwood  from
Oregon, but genetic studies suggest it to be much  more  closely
related  to  typical  R. suksdorfii further west and it has been
accordingly designated  as  R. suksdorfii  subsp.  trisectus.  A
second  outlying  race of R. suksdorfii occurs in the high moun-
tains of eastern Nevada near the famous Bristlecone Pine popula-
tion on Mt Wheeler. This has  been  named  R. suksdorfii  subsp.
caespitosus to reflect its compact bushy form and to distinguish
it from the very similar R. adoneus (see below). The populations
of  R. suksdorfii in Idaho and Montana north of the famous Lewis
and Clarke Trail along the Clearwater  River  probably  warrants
distinction  as  yet another subspecific race with its regularly
taller habit and less sharply pointed leaf indentations.

The leaf subdivisions of R. suksdorfii  subsp.  caespitosus  are
very  narrow,  almost tubular, so that this glaucous diploid has
often been misidentified as R. adoneus Gray which  is  the  mag-
nificent large flowered Rocky Mountain snow-buttercup (sometimes
called  "The  Colorado  Buttercup")  also possessing very narrow
leaf segments. Ranunculus adoneus is found only in the  southern
Rockies of Wyoming and Colorado and the higher parts of Utah and
may  even  reach  northern  New  Mexico. However R. adoneus is a
tetraploid and hence totally separate from its  look-alike,  the
diploid R. suksdorfii subsp. caespitosus from further west.

To  almost complete the story there is another tetraploid in the
Rockies, R. eximius Greene, which extends from beyond the north-
ern range limit of R. adoneus at Togwotee Pass, from  the  Grand
Tetons,  through  Yellowstone  Park  and Montana to the Canadian
border (and possibly  beyond  like  R. suksdorfii)  and  reaches
eastwards to the Bighorn Mts of Wyoming. But R. eximius is quite
unlike  R. adoneus, its fellow tetraploid further south; for its
leaves are elliptical and barely divided at all  with  three  to
five  deep parallel lobes, often giving the appearance of little
raised hands. Finally there is  a  third  diploid,  R. macauleyi
Gray,  south  of R. adoneus in southern Colorado and New Mexico;
this species has long elliptical leaves even narrower than those
of R. eximius to the north. However the teeth  across  the  leaf
tips  of  R. macauleyi  are  very  shallow, in some cases almost
nonexistent.

In most places these diploids and tetraploids  occur  at  higher
altitudes  than  does  the  hexaploid  R. eschscholtzii  so they
seldom meet that wide-ranging  species  because  they  occur  at
different  levels  on the same mountains. However, good evidence
has  been  found  to  explain  anomalous   floral   changes   in
R. eschscholtzii   (Fisher   et  al.  1979),  whereby  apetalous
variants have sometimes locally replaced the  normally  petalled
form  (apetaly  is  a  regular  mutation in R. eschscholtzii but
usually at a low frequency). Favorably wet conditions  sometimes
occur  that allow a few colonies of R. eschscholtzii to tolerate
even full sunlight beside the normal habitat of  the  much  more
numerous diploids (e.g., R. suksdorfii on the Olympics and on Mt
Adams)  or  tetraploids  (e.g., R. adoneus at Teton Pass). These
sometimes form sterile hybrids  with  R. eschscholtzii.  It  has
been  shown  that  the  large  alpine bee-flies (=hover-flies or
Syrphidae) seem unable to distinguish one large shining  butter-
cup  from  another, so that over the years their promiscuity has
caused the selective  replacement  of  the  normally  attractive
petalled  flowers in R. eschscholtzii by apetalous forms. Normal
and viable seed set thus still occurs,  even  though  the  usual
long range bee-flies avoid the tiny flowers, because short-range
pollinators  including  ants  successfully climb up and down ad-
jacent   stems.   Futile   sterile    cross    pollination    of
R. eschscholtzii  to the diploids or tetraploids is thus avoided
even though the keen-eyed Syrphids are busy  only  a  few  yards
away.

Key to the leaves of Snow Buttercup species and subspecies

1. Leaves orbicular with 3-5 shallow lobes (California, Nevada)
   ........................................  R. oxynotus (2n=16)

1. Leaves elliptical or reniform, lobes deeper

   2. Leaves  elliptical in outline, untoothed lobes longer than
      wide

      3. Leaves with 3 to 5 deep, almost parallel, pointed lobes
         (Wyom. Mont. BC?) .................  R. eximius (2n=32)

      3. Leaves with 3 to 7 shallow end teeth, otherwise unlobed
         (Utah Colo. N.Mex.) .............  R. macauleyi (2n=16)

   2. Leaves reniform in outline deeply 3-5 lobed

      4. Lobes deeply trisected

         5. Plants short,  compact,  slightly  glaucous  (Nevada
            Utah?) ...  R. suksdorfii subsp. caespitosus (2n=16)

         5. Plants loose, not glaucous (Wyom. Utah Colo. N.Mex)
            ................................  R. adoneus (2n=32)

      4. Lobes toothed but not trisected

         6. Teeth  rounded, central lobe often untoothed, almost
            lingulate (all western mountains, Alaska to northern
            Mex. and southern Cal.)
            ..........................  R. eschscholtzii (2n=48)

         6. Teeth sharply distinct, central lobe +/- 3-5 toothed

            7. Leaf surfaces green, sharply toothed lobes  wider
               than long (Cal. Oreg. Wash. Mont. Wyom. BC?)
               ........  R. suksdorfii subsp. suksdorfii (2n=16)

            7. Leaf  surfaces  glaucous,  trisected lobes longer
               than wide (Oreg, Idaho)
               ..........  R suksdorfii subsp. trisectus (2n=16)

(The   predominantly   far-northern   12-ploid   R. nivalis   L.
[incl.R. sulphureus Soland.ex Phipps] has very distinctive black
hairs  on the sepals. An outlying population occurs at Beartooth
Pass, Wyoming.)

References:

Fisher, F.J.F., J.A. Rowley, & C.J. Marchant. 1973. The biogeog-
   raphy of  western  snow-patch  Ranunculi  of  North  America.
   Compte  rendu  sommaire des seances. Societe de Biogeographie
   438:32-43.
Fisher, F.J.F.,  A.  Warner,  &  E.M.  Reimer.  1979.  Anomalous
   apetaly:   localized  character  displacement  in  Ranunculus
   eschscholtzii. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 2097-2106.
Rowley, J.A., F.J.F. Fisher, & C.J.  Marchant.  1975.  Distribu-
   tion,  ecology  and  photosynthesis  of  alpine  Ranunculi in
   Western North America. Proc. New Zealand  Ecological  Society
   22(1975): 113-115.


WHERE HAS ALL THE CLOVER GONE?
From: Nancy J. Turner <nturner@uvic.ca>

In September, 1991, T.C. Brayshaw collected a modest specimen of
Trifolium  wormskioldii  on Dallas Road, at the west point south
of Menzies Street ("along seashore; open, south-facing,  eroding
bank above beach, mainly grassy" V 151489). As he has been doing
for  many,  many  years, with this collection he was helping us,
with his careful,  meticulous  work,  to  understand  our  flora
better  and  to  document  the changes that have occurred to our
local ecosystems. We owe him so much for his critical  contribu-
tions.  In  the case of this collection, it is particularly sig-
nificant because, as far as I can determine, it represented  the
last   population   of   T.   wormskioldii  along  the  Victoria
waterfront. Bob (Turner) and I went to this  site  a  couple  of
weeks  ago  and  found and enormous cement storm drain enclosure
and no sign of this native clover, although there were plenty of
introduced clovers and grasses and even some Camassia,  Sanicula
bipinnatifida  and  other  characteristic  native species in the
vicinity.

Trifolium wormskioldii Lehm. was once common - even  abundant  -
all  along  this stretch of Victoria's coastline. James Douglas,
when he arrived here in 1842, commented  on  the  clover,  which
Chris  Brayshaw,  Adam Szczawinski and others conclude must have
been, at least in part, T. wormskioldii:

"Both Kinds [of soil], however, produce Abundance of Grass,  and
several   varieties  of  Red  Clover  grow  on  the  rich  moist
Bottoms.... In Two Places particularly, we saw several Acres  of
Clover growing with a Luxuriance and Compactness more resembling
the  close  Sward  of  a well-managed Lea than the Produce of an
uncultivated Waste." (Douglas's  report,  Fort  Vancouver,  HBC,
July 12, 1842)

In  fact,  the  point  where  Douglas first disembarked from the
Beaver he himself named Clover Point,  from  the  fact  that  "a
large  area  of  ground here was found covered with a species of
red clover, growing most luxuriently" (Walbran  1971:  96).  For
Douglas,  the  clover and meadowlands he found were an indicator
of the potential of the area for  modification  and  management,
for  re-creating  England  and  the  English  style of land use.
"Being pretty well assured of the Capabilities of  the  Soil  as
respects  the  Purposes  of  Agriculture, the Climate being also
mild and pleasant, we ought to be able to  grow  every  Kind  of
Grain Raised in England..."

The  clover  was  seen  as  a  promising  indication of the pos-
sibilities for improvements: "The growth of  indigenous  vegeta-
tion  is more luxuriant, than in any other place, I have seen in
America, indicating a rich productive soil. Though the survey  I
made was rather laborious, not being so light and active of foot
as  in  my younger days, I was nevertheless delighted in ranging
over fields knee deep in clover, tall grasses and ferns reaching
above our heats, at  these  unequivocal  proofs  of  fertility".
(James Douglas in Hargrave 1938: 420-421, as cited by Akrigg and
Akrigg 1975: 357.)

Unfortunately,  the scale and scope of landscape change that has
emanated from this concept  has  not  been  easily  measured  or
acknowledged,  and  the cultural and biological impacts have not
been fully assessed. For  First  Peoples,  the  loss  of  valued
cultural resources caused profound grief and sadness, still felt
today  by  Elders who remember some of the lands as they used to
be. For most people, however, the loss of lands  and  resources,
if  recognized  at  all,  is  seen  as  the inevitable result of
progress. Many people still  do  not  grasp  the  importance  of
maintaining  "wild"  ecosystems  or  species, and, if they value
greenspace, it makes little difference to them whether it  is  a
green lawn, and agricultural field, or a natural wood or meadow.
Many people still view any uncultivated area as "waste", just as
James Douglas did over 150 years ago. The value in this land and
its  ecosystems,  for  them, is in their potential, not in them-
selves.

This is well  reflected  in  the  words  of  Berhold  Seeman,  a
naturalist  with  the  expedition which sailed in H.M.S. Herald,
under Captain Henry Kellett, D.B., 1845-51, who  wrote  in  June
27, 1846: "In walking from Ogden Point round to Fort Victoria, a
distance  of  little  more  than a mile, we thought we had never
seen a more beautiful country; it quite  exceeded  our  expecta-
tion;  and  yet  Vancouver's descriptions made us look for some-
thing beyond common scenery. It is a natural  park;  noble  oaks
and  ferns  are seen in the greatest luxuriance; thickets of the
hazel [?] and the willow, shrubberies  of  the  poplar  and  the
alder,  are dotted about. One could hardly believe that this was
not the work of art; more particularly  when  finding  signs  of
cultivation in every direction--enclosed pasture-land, fields of
wheat,  potatoes  and  turnips. Civilization had encroached upon
the beautiful domain, and the savage could no  longer  exist  in
the  filth  and  indolence  of  mere animal life.... The fort of
Victoria was founded in 1843, and stands on the  east  shore  of
the  harbour,  or  rather creek, about a mile from the entrance.
The approach is pretty by nature, though somewhat rude  by  art.
The  first  place  we came to was the dairy, an establishment of
great importance to the fort.... We were astonished  at  all  we
saw.  About 160 acres are cultivated with oats, wheat, potatoes,
turnips, carrots, and other vegetables, and every day more  land
is  converted  into fields. Barely three years had elapsed since
the settlement was made, yet all the necessaries and most of the
comforts of  civilized  life  already  existed  in  what  was  a
wilderness..." (Scholefield, 1914)

Yet, unrecognized by the colonists, the lands they were changing
were  already under a degree of care and management by the local
First Peoples, and the existing  resources  were  already  being
used, just not in the ways that the newcomers could perceive. As
a  result,  resources  that  were desired and once plentiful for
First Peoples were intentionally and unintentionally diminished,
at least in part because their value was  not  acknowledged.  Of
course,  as  these species dwindled in range and abundance, they
became less salient to the First Peoples themselves, and as this
occurred, the cultural memory about them diminished. Thus, in  a
spiraling  downward  cycle, species deteriorated and disappeared
and only a few noticed or cared. Those who cared were  not  able
to  communicate  their  concerns  to  those who were causing the
changes. In short, there was a terrible  lack  of  communication
that has continued to the present day.

As noted, Trifolium wormskioldii, because it is a perennial, and
because when it grows luxuriantly it forms a very showy display,
is  likely  the  major  species referred to by James Douglas and
after which Clover Point off Dallas Road is named. Its  rhizomes
were  also  a  valued food of First Nations and were undoubtedly
used by the Lekwungen peoples who used the area around Ross  Bay
and  Beacon  Hill Park along with the rest of the Victoria area.
Dr. Newcombe collected this  species  in  June,1917  off  Dallas
Road, Victoria, on "moist ground near the sea" (V: 42028, 42029;
8951),  and  specimens in the Royal B.C. Herbarium (V) show that
it has grown in many sites around the city . It is characterized
as "common" (J.R. Anderson, 1920) and growing  in  "open  grass"
(J.R.  Anderson,  1920),  "rich  meadows" (J.R. Anderson, 1894),
"rich open lands (J.R.  Anderson,  1896),  "damp  ground"  (M.C.
Melburn,  1970),  "moist  meadow" (T.C. Brayshaw, 1981); or "dry
open ground (V.E.I. Goddard, 1930). Yet, although  other  native
clover  species  can  still  be readily found on rocky sites and
refugia around the  city,  T.  wormskioldii,  cannot  be  called
"common"  around  Victoria  today by any stretch of the imagina-
tion. It is, in fact, virtually absent from the entire  Victoria
coastline.  The  work  of  Chris Brayshaw has helped us to piece
together its passing, and, maybe it will help  us  to  bring  it
back again.

References:

Akrigg,  G.P.V.  & H.B. Akrigg. 1975. British Columbia chronicle
   1178-1846: Adventures  by  sea  and  land.  Discovery  Press,
   Vancouver, B.C.
Douglas,  James.  Douglas'  original  field  journal. Provincial
   Archives, British Columbia. File: A-B-40-D75.4A
Hargrave,  J.  1938.  The  Hargrave  correspondence,  1821-1843;
   edited with introduction and notes by G. P. de T. Glazebrook.
   The   publications   of  the  Champlain  society,  xxiv.  The
   Champlain society, Toronto.
Scholefield, E.O.S. 1914. British  Columbia  from  the  earliest
   times to the present. Volume I and II. S.J. Clarke Publishing
   Company, Vancouver, B.C.
Walbran, J.T. 1971. (originally published 1909) British Columbia
   coast  names,  1592-1906,  to  which are added a few names in
   adjacent United States territory; their origin  and  history.
   Vancouver Public Library & J.J. Douglas, Vancouver, B.C.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions: Send "subscribe BEN-L" or "unsubscribe BEN-L"
   (no apostrophes) to  majordomo@victoria.tc.ca
Send submissions to BEN-L@victoria.tc.ca
BEN is archived at http://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/ben/
________________________________________________________________