[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Swales & Mudslides (fwd)
------- Forwarded Message
- ---------
From: Jeff Jacobsen <jjj@otter.wsipc.wednet.edu>
Subject: Re: Swales & Mudslides (fwd)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 06:23:22 -0800 (PST)
To: Michael Yount <yount@csf.Colorado.EDU>
Michael,
I would think the swales would need to capture the water away from the
slopes. For example, you would probably never think to put a swale at the
edge of a bluff. But if a swale could catch the water before it got near
the edge of the bluff it could reduce the amount of water weight at the
edge of the bluff were it could do damage. To be effective the swales
must capture the water and hold it where it won't do any damage.
Cheers,
Jeff J
jjj@otter.wsipc.wednet.edu
On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Michael Yount wrote:
> ------- Forwarded Message
> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 23:40:20 -0800
> To: owner-permaculture@envirolink.org
> From: Michael Murphy <michael@ctsl.com>
> Subject: Re: Swales & Mudslides
>
> As everyone knows, Noorthern California is Mudslideville. Here's my
> question: will swales reduce/prevent mudslides? Obviously, they stop
> erosion by slowing water and putting it into the dirt - but when the dirt
> is saturated, we get mudslides. If I could make a coherent argument to
> FEMA/SBA, I think we could get a major loan program (4%, 30 years) to build
> swales everywhere. I was in this program after the '82 floods and they are
> very loose about flood damage/damage prevention IF the landowner can make a
> coherent argument. So - any evidence to support the hypothesis? Thanks.
>
>
>
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>
>
------- End of Forwarded Message
Follow-Ups: