[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Unsubscribe Permaculture WA
If I wanted a political forum I'd ring a pollie
> ----------
> From: Jenny Shipley[SMTP:shipley@bigpond.com]
> Reply To: PERMA@eepo.com.au
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 January 1997 0:11
> To: Permaculture WA
> Subject: Re: Republic (fwd)
>
> Please, please, please take me off your mailing list. Thanks
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Victor Guest <vic@daena.eepo.com.au>
> To: Permaculture WA <perma@eepo.com.au>
> Date: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 12:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Republic (fwd)
>
>
> >I believe this document is available at the following web site. I include
> >this on the basis of attacks on our community control of health (SOMA)
> and
> >soveriengty.
> >Vic.
> >
> >http://www.gil.com.au/va/scss
> >--------------------------------snip---------------------------------
> >the only things I consider suitable for a Permaculture list are how to
> >successfully build and operate small to medium scale local sustainable
> >systems of life support. full stop.
> >
> >To: Paul Meleng <paul.meleng@eepo.com.au>
> >Date: Monday, 8 February 1999 0:18
> >Subject: Republic
> >
> >
> >>Paul will you peruse this and see if you think it is suitable to
> >>send to the permaculture list.
> >>
> >>From: Victor Bridger <socred@gil.com.au>
> >>X-Attachments: E:\Internet News\ISCN Jan99.htm;
> >>
> >>--=====================_918317929==_
> >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >>
> >>Due to considerable over the use of the word Democracy we have offered
> an
> >>attachment for readers to peruse.
> >><p><font size="2">This year, there will be an increase in the
> >>pressure for Australia to become a Republic. Whether or not the
> >>name is changed is of little relevance. What does it matter if
> >>Australia is called the Republic of Australia rather than the
> >>Commonwealth of Australia? It matters not. Providing that the
> >>Australian people are protected, not only with the balances and
> >>checks that exist now, plus additional safeguards within the
> >>current Constitutional Monarchy, a name change is purely
> >>cosmetic. What does matter however are changes to the
> >>Constitution, proposed on the basis of spurious, nebulous and
> >>often misleading statements.</font></p>
> >
> >I believe this document is available at the following web site. I include
> >this on the basis of attacks on our community control of health and
> >soveriengty.
> >Vic.
> >
> >http://www.gil.com.au/va/scss
>