[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Thermocouples
In article <12175.usenet@merckx.graphics.cornell.edu>,
PFEIFFER <AE%SJSUVM1.BITNET@cmsa.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:
>Dave Hatunen says:
>> Again: thermocouples require two junctions, and the emf is a function
>> of the temperature differential between them. So if you already have a
>> source of higher temperature, then, with the other junction at ambient,
>> you can produce a small amount of energy. But if you do not have a
>> temperature differential, then thermocouples are useless.
>>
>In many cases you have already temperature differentials.
>This is the nice thing with thermocouples
>Sources of surplus high temperatures you have for example in the case of
>power stations or even by some solar applications let alone some
>industries as the steel industry. The question is the efficiency and especiall
y
>the costs per kWh.
Quite true. But I believe the original poster was under the impression
that somehow they generated an emf from only the one temperature.
Once you have a temperature differential there are all sorts of ways to
derive a little power; thermocouples are probably the worst choice
except under very singular circumstances.
--
********** DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@netcom.com) **********
* Daly City California: *
* where San Francisco meets The Peninsula *
* and the San Andreas Fault meets the Sea *
*******************************************************