Re: Bill Tucker's anti-SANET posting

mmarler (mmarler@ix.netcom.com)
Thu, 5 Dec 1996 19:29:02 -0600

I would like to say something but I can't top Spurgeon Smith, SO DITTO.

J.C. Dowler
Bucyrus, KS
----------
> From: spurgeon smith <spurg@worldnet.att.net>
> To: Nathaniel S. Bacon <nbacon@zoo.uvm.edu>
> Cc: sanet-mg@amani.ces.ncsu.edu
> Subject: Re: Bill Tucker's anti-SANET posting
> Date: Wednesday, December 04, 1996 7:50 PM
>
>
> Thanks for your defence of the graze-l folks. As a low input management
> intensive grazier in central Texas, I have found many of the postings in
> this list childish & naive, if not downright kooky. I think Bill
Tucker's
> post was timely and appropriate, and his action in unsubscribing is one I

> shall shortly follow.
>
> Too bad about the way this list seems to attract prolix faddists --
there
> is lots of good stuff here, but I don't have the time to sort out the
raving
> luddites.
>
> Thanks again --
>
> Spurgeon Smith
> Elgin Texas
>
>
> >
>