Re: GRAZE-L digest 165 (fwd)

Andy Richker (lamu@wt.net)
Wed, 18 Dec 1996 09:07:28 -0600

As much as I hate to encourage this thread, I feel compelled to comment
here. Obviously any person with access to a computer can subscribe to this
list and obviously they do. Therefore there are many individual attitudes.
Some of these might be extreme to many people and might be judgmental. The
extreme ones seem to bother some people but I believe it is the judgmental
ones that are a problem. Any post that "paint every
>dairyperson, swineherd, shepherd, cattleperson, beekeeper, and
>chickenchaser with the same broad, black brush." seems judgmental and
>should be dealt with accordingly,like no response. However, as someone
>posted not long ago, some things that might seem very radical 10 years
>seem to moving to the mainstream nowadays. This seems to be a very typical
>phenomenon; 100 years ago most of the modern conveniences we take for
>granted were not even available but most people have a hard time dealing
>with change that doesn't fit their picture of life.

Woody,
I think you said it very succinctly in reference to the
applications of industrial practices to husbandry. Good job. The only
thing I would like to add is I find it curious that cattlepeople or others
in a similar vein see nothing strange about caring and probably even liking
their herds and then killing them. I think it is bit of a shame that
especially these people who can practice such a positive interaction with
their land and animals end up having to exploit them for their own
livelihood. But I guess this is the nature of capitalism. I hope I have not
personally offended the cattlepeople but I imagine it would be difficult
for many of them not to take this personally. I apologize in advance for
any malalignment.

Hey folks these list are a forum of exchange. Hopefully you get more
positive benefit than negative, but like 'they' say even a stopped clock
(old style) is right twice a day.

I agree with your quote about abiding with nature, the question is who's
definition of abiding are we using??

Andy

>Nat:
>
>Thanks for the post forwarded from GRAZE-L. I too have been put off by
>SANet contributors, animal rights activists, and others who paint every
>dairyperson,
SNIP

>*Of course* the application of industrial practices to husbandry is an
>aberration, an evil in our culture. It is the corporate mentality and
>our own addiction to cheap protein which drives the chicken, beef, and
>pork factories with their horror stories. It's toward these that the
>criticism ought to be directed.
>
>Woody Wodraska
>woodyw@juno.com
>"There is no scarcity abiding in Nature.
>Any scarcity we see is our own doing."