[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TH: Re: Usenet Newsgroup
Post-To: Tree-House@Majordomo.Flora.Com (Community Forestry) ----------
-------
RT Ellsberry wrote:
>
> Post-To: Tree-House@Majordomo.Flora.Com (Community Forestry) ----------
> -------
> On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Bgingg wrote:
>
> > I support the sci.environment.community.trees designator as I believe
> > that the rec.parks is not inclusive enough.
>
> Expert Usenet advice indicates that sci.environment.community.trees
> cannot pass for 2 reasons. 1st, it requires adding on 2 fields instead
> of only one, leaving 'sci.environment.community' as a pointer to
> an object which does not exist. This could be tweaked sci.environment.
> community-trees, but that fails for reason #2 which is that the term
> 'community' is controversial for some reason and is being debated
> under rec.pets.cats.community (I don't make this stuff up). Beverly,
> could you support 'sci.environment.forests' -- expressly inclusive
> of community forests, backyard forests, old-growth etc ?
>
> > ... A newsgroup (in addition to the listserv) in
> > the same vein could reach more folks and expand the benefits. Just my
> > .02!
> >
> > Beverly Gingg, Coordinator
>
> As always, your contributions are much appreciated, Beverly.
>
> Richard@Flora.Com
> -------------------------+----------------------+----------------------
> Richard Tryzno Ellsberry | FloraList Operations | Baltimore USDA Zone 7
> -------------------------+-( http://Flora.Com )-+----------------------
Hi
I just got in on this conversation. Are you talking about what name to
search the net with in order to find tree groups??
You may try arborist or arboriculture
References: